Skip to main content

Table 1 Estimates of intercept and slope (± standard error) from linear regressions of log-variance on log-mean

From: Bacterial microcosms obey Taylor's law: effects of abiotic and biotic stress and genetics on mean and variance of population density

 

Intercept

Slope

95% C.I.

[lower; upper]

Adjusted

R 2

n

Overall

0.38 ± 0.29

1.89 ± 0.03

[1.83; 1.96]

0.99

40

Plate

   KB

5.62 ± 1.23

1.33 ± 0.13

[1.06; 1.61]

0.85

20

   KB+rif

0.28 ± 0.36

1.91 ± 0.04

[1.81; 2.00]

0.99

20

Strain

   MutS/Rif-

-0.36 ± 0.83

1.97 ± 0.10

[1.75; 2.19]

0.98

10

   MutS/Rif+

3.47 ± 1.78

1.57 ± 0.19

[1.14; 2.00]

0.89

10

   WT/Rif-

0.44 ± 0.25

1.87 ± 0.03

[1.80; 1.94]

0.99

10

   WT/Rif+

2.94 ± 0.98

1.62 ± 0.11

[1.37; 1.87]

0.96

10

   Rif- (pooled)

0.22 ± 0.34

1.90 ± 0.04

[1.82; 1.99]

0.99

20

   Rif + (pooled)

2.98 ± 0.75

1.62 ± 0.08

[1.45; 1.79]

0.96

20

   WT (pooled)

0.62 ± 0.31

1.87 ± 0.04

[1.79; 1.94]

0.99

20

   MutS (pooled)

-0.25 ± 0.61

1.96 ± 0.07

[1.82; 2.11]

0.98

20

Treatment

   Ancestor

-0.30 ± 0.31

1.92 ± 0.04

[1.84; 2.01]

0.99

8

   Control

-0.21 ± 0.52

1.95 ± 0.06

[1.81; 2.10]

0.99

8

   Rifampicin

-33.71 ± 7.12

5.43 ± 0.74

[3.68; 7.18]

0.90

8

   Phage

0.97 ± 0.56

1.86 ± 0.07

[1.69; 2.03]

0.99

8

   Rifampicin and phage

3.95 ± 0.81

1.51 ± 0.09

[1.29; 1.73]

0.97

8

  1. Least-squares regressions of log10 variance of bacterial density on log10 mean density (in colony-forming units per milliliter) were fitted across all data (overall) or fitted separately for the different assay environments (plate), bacterial strains, and long-term treatments. For each regression, the 95% confidence interval (C.I.) for the slope is given. Bold type indicates slopes significantly different from +2 (upper and lower boundaries calculated as mean slope ± tn-1, 95%× standard error). False discovery rate method was used to correct for multiple testing (García 2004). Also given are the adjusted R2 and the number of data points (n).