From: Assessing hydrological and provisioning ecosystem services in a case study in Western Central Brazil
(a) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Land use-specific value points | Nitrogen retention potential | |||
Value classes | High | Intermediate | Low | |
Land use types | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Coffee | 0–10 | 0 | −10 | −20 |
- | 11–20 | 0 | −10 | −20 |
Arable land, cotton; | 21–30 | 0 | −10 | −20 |
Irrigated land | 31–40 | 0 | −5 | −10 |
- | 41–50 | 0 | −5 | −10 |
Vegetables; Fruits | 51–60 | 0 | −5 | −10 |
Arable land, corn tillage/no tillage | 61–70 | 0 | 0 | −5 |
Arable land, general, no tillage | 71–80 | 0 | 0 | −5 |
Arable land, bean | 81–90 | 0 | 0 | −5 |
Cerrado; Campo; Arable land, sorghum; tillage/ no tillage | 91–100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(b) | ||||
Land use-specific value points | Yield potential | |||
Value class | High | Intermediate | Low | |
Land use types | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
All arable land use types | 0–100 | 0 | −10 | −20 |