Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview and description of applied LULCC scenarios (a) and scenario results (b) according to land use-based assessment (LU) and combined land use-based and ecosystem potential (EP) assessment (LU + EP)

From: Assessing hydrological and provisioning ecosystem services in a case study in Western Central Brazil

 

(a)

(b)

  

Water purification

Sediment retention

Water retention

Food and fodder

Affected area of river basin

ID

Description

LU

LU + EP

LU

LU + EP

LU

LU + EP

LU

LU + EP

[%]

BAU

Current (2010) land use distribution (baseline scenario)

88

88

86

83

48

46

31

30

-

 

Change of riparian areas (Ri) with a low potential for nitrogen retention

Ri-1

… toward native tree Savanna (Cerrado)

88

88

86

83

49

47

30

30

2

Ri-2

… toward forests (afforestation)

88

88

86

83

49

47

30

30

2

Ri-3

… toward pasture

88

88

86

83

48

46

31

30

2

Ri-4

… toward natural forest (Mata)

88

88

86

83

49

47

30

30

2

Ri-5

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

88

88

86

83

48

46

31

31

2

 

Change of native grass Savanna (Campo, Ca)

         

Ca-1

… toward irrigated land

86

86

85

82

46

44

34

33

3

Ca-2

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

87

87

86

82

46

44

32

32

3

Ca-3

… toward arable land (corn, till)

87

87

84

81

45

44

33

33

3

Ca-4

… toward pasture

88

88

86

82

47

45

31

31

3

 

Change of areas with low nitrogen retention potential (NRP)

         

NRP-1

… toward Cerrado

88

88

87

83

49

47

30

30

4

NRP-2

… toward forests (afforestation)

88

88

86

83

48

46

30

30

4

NRP-3

… toward pasture

88

88

86

83

48

46

31

30

4

NRP-4

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

88

88

86

82

46

44

32

32

4

NRP-5

… toward irrigated land

86

86

85

82

46

44

34

33

4

 

Change of areas with steep slopes(Sl)

         

Sl-1

… toward Cerrado

88

88

87

83

49

47

30

30

5

Sl-2

… toward forests (afforestation)

88

88

86

83

48

46

30

30

5

Sl-3

… toward pasture

88

88

86

82

47

45

31

31

5

Sl-4

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

87

87

86

82

45

44

33

32

5

Sl-5

… toward arable land (corn, till)

86

86

83

80

45

43

34

33

5

Sl-6

… toward irrigated land

85

85

85

81

45

44

35

35

5

 

Change of degraded Cerrado (DC)

         

DC-1

… toward Cerrado

88

88

87

84

52

50

31

30

6

DC-2

… toward forests (afforestation)

88

88

87

83

50

48

31

30

6

DC-3

… toward natural forest (Mata)

88

88

87

84

52

50

31

30

6

DC-4

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

87

87

86

82

47

45

34

34

6

DC-5

… toward arable land (corn, no-till)

86

86

83

79

46

44

35

35

6

DC-6

… toward pasture

88

88

86

82

49

47

32

31

6

DC-7

… toward irrigated land

84

84

85

81

47

45

37

37

6

 

Change of riparian areas (Ri) with an intermediate potential retention function

        

Ri-6

… toward Cerrado

89

89

87

84

51

49

29

29

8

Ri-7

… toward forests (afforestation)

89

89

87

83

49

47

29

29

8

Ri-8

… toward pasture

89

89

86

83

48

46

31

30

8

Ri-9

… toward natural forest (Mata)

89

89

87

84

51

49

29

29

8

Ri-10

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

87

87

86

82

45

43

33

33

8

 

Change of riparian areas (Ri) with an intermediate and low potential retention function

      

Ri-11

… toward natural Cerrado

89

89

87

84

52

50

29

28

10

Ri-12

… toward forests (afforestation)

89

89

87

84

49

47

29

28

10

Ri-13

… toward pasture

89

89

86

83

48

46

30

30

10

Ri-14

… toward natural forest (Mata)

89

89

87

84

52

50

29

28

10

Ri-15

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

87

87

86

82

45

43

34

34

10

Ri-16

… toward irrigated land

82

82

84

81

45

43

39

38

10

 

Change of Cerrado(Ce)

         

Ce-1

… toward irrigated land

81

81

83

79

41

39

41

40

10

Ce-2

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

86

86

85

81

41

39

36

35

10

Ce-3

… toward arable land (corn, till)

84

84

80

76

39

37

38

37

10

Ce-4

… toward degraded Cerrado

88

88

85

82

42

40

31

30

10

 

Distance to water (D): Change of areas close to surface waters (irrespective of their current land use)

     

D-1

… toward Cerrado

89

89

88

85

53

51

28

28

14

D-2

… toward forests (afforestation)

89

89

87

84

49

47

28

28

14

D-3

… toward pasture

89

89

86

82

47

45

30

30

14

D-4

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

86

86

86

82

43

41

35

35

14

 

Change of degraded Cerrado and Cerrado (DCC)

         

DCC-1

… toward arable land (general, no-till)

85

85

85

81

40

38

39

38

17

DCC-2

… toward arable land (corn, no-till)

82

82

85

81

40

38

43

42

17

DCC-3

… toward pasture

88

88

84

81

45

43

33

33

17

DCC-4

… irrigated land

77

77

82

78

40

38

47

46

17

 

Change of pastureland (Pa)

         

Pa-1

… toward Cerrado

88

88

89

87

57

55

27

27

21

Pa-2

… toward grass Savanna (Campo)

88

88

89

87

57

55

27

27

21

Pa-3

… toward forests (afforestation)

88

88

89

85

51

49

27

27

21

Pa-4

… toward natural forest (Mata)

88

88

90

87

57

55

27

27

21

Pa-5

… arable land (general, no-till)

84

84

87

83

41

39

38

37

21

Pa-6

… toward arable land (corn, no-till)

81

81

88

84

41

39

43

42

21

 

Combined (C): Change of areas with low potential for nitrogen retention, runoff retention, sediment retention, and production potential

C-1

… toward Cerrado

90

90

89

86

56

54

27

27

23

 

Change of arable land (general) (Ar)

         

Ar-1

… toward arable land (soy, till)

95

95

76

73

40

39

33

32

47

Ar-2

… toward arable land (wheat)

94

94

81

78

48

46

24

23

47

Ar-3

… toward arable land (corn, no-till)

81

81

88

85

48

46

42

42

47

Ar-4

… toward Cerrado

97

97

92

90

82

81

7

7

47

  1. (Scenarios were tabulated according to the affected area).