Skip to main content

Table 1 A comparison of the three participatory methods employed in understanding ecological processes

From: Assessing stakeholders' perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods

Participatory method/case study

Types of participationa

Typologies of stakeholders that can be included

Level and type of analysis of ecological aspects

Main kind of values elicited

Participatory scenario planning in Doñana coastal wetland, Spain

Participation in information giving/Functional participationb

All

Broad analysis of ecological aspects focusing more upon the interrelations among factors

Others-oriented values, group values, supporting values

Participatory mapping in rubber agroforest landscape, Indonesia

Participation by consultation/Functional participation

All

Administrative boundaries and land use types, location of water sources, production and critical conservation areas

Anthropocentric and bio-centric values, group and physical values

Role playing games in rubber agroforest landscape, Indonesia

Interactive participation

Depending on the research objective/s

Abstract representation of ecological processes and dynamics

Anthropocentric and bio-centric values, transformative and non-transformative values, non-market-mediated values

Evaluation of visual preferences in transhumance cultural landscapes, Spain

Participation by consultation

Depending on the research objective/s

Perception of ecosystem services delivery, some directly and some indirectly but all, linked to ecological aspects

Physical and metaphysical, bio-centric, self-oriented values

  1. aBased on Pretty et al. ([1995]).
  2. bThis method has the potential to allow the introduction of interactive participation.