Many public urban parks, but who profits from them? The example of Tabriz, Iran

Ecological Processes

Table 7 Type of parks and social status profits

Type of park	Social status	First ring		Second ring		Third ring		Sum of population in three rings	Percent of population to park access (three rings)
Type of park	Social status	Number of population	Percent of population to park access	Number of population	Percent of population to park access	Number of population	Percent of population to park access	Sum of population in three rings	Percent of population to park access (three rings)
City park	Low	62,695	8.6	142,260	19.4	174,414	23.8	379,369	51.8
	Middle	37,484	6.7	183,353	33.0	197,888	35.6	418,725	75.3
	High	15,881	14.5	45,873	41.8	45,624	41.6	107,378	97.9
Regional park	Low	186,693	25.5	306,931	41.9	143,933	19.7	637,557	87.0
	Middle	186,448	33.5	209,189	37.6	145,093	26.1	540,730	97.3
	High	29,937	27.3	32,712	29.8	32,699	29.8	95,348	86.9
Community park	Low	34,413	4.7	124,254	17.0	281,794	38.5	440,461	60.1
	Middle	32,865	5.9	81,244	14.6	224,958	40.5	339,067	61.0
	High	12,965	11.8	27,884	25.4	42,983	39.2	83,832	76.4
Neighborhood park	Low	84,808	11.6	158,298	21.6	168,938	23.1	412,044	56.3
	Middle	83,329	15.0	197,694	35.6	209,074	37.6	490,097	88.2
	High	12,816	11.7	28,684	26.2	44,862	40.9	86,362	78.7
Pocket park	Low	21,558	2.9	50,632	6.9	0	0.0	72,190	9.9
	Middle	22,160	4.0	44,842	8.1	0	0.0	67,002	12.1
	High	4,010	3.7	5,312	4.8	0	0.0	9,322	8.5