Variables | Perceptions towards the concept of PFM | Perceptions towards implementation of PFM | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ć | t | P value | Ć | t | P value | |
Intercept | ā2.10 | ā1.31 | ā | 2.36 | 2.09 | ā |
Sex (femaleā=ā1and maleā=ā2) | 0.15 | 1.14 | 0.26 | ā0.14 | ā1.0 | 0.32 |
Age | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.97 | ā0.16 | ā0.54 | 0.59 |
Levels of education | 0.36 | 2.75a | 0.003 | ā0.18 | ā0.80 | 0.43 |
Family size per household | ā0.47 | ā2.20a | 0.003 | ā0.21 | ā1.08 | 0.29 |
Occupation | 0.22 | 1.10 | 0.28 | ā0.16 | ā0.72 | 0.46 |
Annual income (ETB) | 0.64 | 2.77a | 0.003 | 0.07 | 0.36 | 0.72 |
Livestock ownership (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.14 | ā0.66 | 0.52 | ā0.15 | ā0.62 | 0.54 |
Had enough grazing land (Yesā=ā2) | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.75 |
Wanted to keep more livestock in the future (Yesā=ā2) | 0.16 | 1.19 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.66 |
Had shortage of fodder for livestock (Yesā=ā2) | 0.60 | 2.87a | 0.003 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 0.47 |
Length of duration of residence in the area (years) | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.84 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.89 |
History of settlement | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.92 |
Had the plan to stay in the area in the future | 0.14 | 1.18 | 0.25 | ā0.03 | ā0.22 | 0.83 |
Private land ownership (Yesā=ā2) | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.78 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.84 |
Allocated land for woodlot plantation (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.01 | ā0.09 | 0.93 | ā0.07 | ā0.52 | 0.61 |
Had shortage of fuelwood (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.31 | ā2.96a | 0.003 | ā0.30 | ā2.94a | 0.003 |
Benefited due to PFM (Yesā=ā2) | 0.52 | 4.02a | 0.0001 | 0.52 | 3.02a | 0.002 |
Knowledge of the respondents on WWF (Yesā=ā2) | 0.15 | 1.17 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 0.76 |
Distance between the edge of the WWF and the residential area of the respondents | ā0.11 | ā0.50 | 0.62 | ā0.10 | ā0.38 | 0.71 |
Had a tree planting and growing tradition (Yesā=ā2) | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.77 | ā0.33 | ā1.33 | 0.19 |