Variables | Attitudes towards managing WWF through participatory approach | Attitudes towards having the responsibility to protect WWF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ć | t | P value | Ć | t | P value | |
Intercept | 1.76 | 1.51 | ā | 4.85 | 2.83 | ā |
Sex (femaleā=ā1 and maleā=ā2) | ā0.15 | ā1.05 | 0.30 | ā0.13 | ā1.003 | 0.32 |
Age | 1.32 | 0.97 | 0.34 | 0.007 | 0.01 | 1.0 |
Levels of education | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.77 | 0.33 | 1.63 | 0.11 |
Family size per household | 0.26 | 1.23 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.87 | 0.39 |
Occupation | ā0.14 | ā0.62 | 0.54 | ā0.06 | ā0.27 | 0.79 |
Annual income (ETB) | ā0.64 | ā2.79a | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Livestock ownership (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.06 | ā0.27 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 2.82a | 0.003 |
Had enough grazing land (Yesā=ā2) | 0.35 | 2.91a | 0.003 | ā0.17 | ā1.05 | 0.30 |
Wanted to keep more livestock in the future (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.02 | ā0.17 | 0.87 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.98 |
Had shortage of fodder for livestock (Yesā=ā2) | 0.13 | 0.61 | 0.54 | ā0.54 | ā2.93a | 0.003 |
Length of duration of residence in the area (years) | ā1.34 | ā0.88 | 0.39 | ā0.47 | ā0.34 | 0.73 |
History of settlement | ā0.70 | ā0.77 | 0.45 | ā0.14 | ā0.17 | 0.86 |
Had the plan to stay in the area in the future | ā0.20 | ā1.50 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 3.90a | 0.0001 |
Private land ownership (Yesā=ā2) | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.90 | ā0.28 | ā0.76 | 0.45 |
Allocated land for woodlot plantation (Yesā=ā2) | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.70 | ā0.32 | ā2.79a | 0.003 |
Had shortage of fuelwood (Yesā=ā2) | 0.07 | 0.43 | 0.67 | ā0.37 | ā2.96a | 0.003 |
Benefited due to PFM (Yesā=ā2) | 0.34 | 2.41a | 0.003 | 0.41 | 3.26a | 0.002 |
Knowledge of the respondents on WWF (Yesā=ā2) | 0.02 | ā0.17 | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.74 |
Distance between the edge of the WWF and the residential area of the respondents | 0.32 | 1.28 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.91 |
Had a tree planting and growing tradition (Yesā=ā2) | 0.19 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 1.52 | 0.14 |