Skip to main content

Table 2 Qualitative assessment of diverse values of varied local forests as perceived by the Adi tribe

From: Classification and management of community forests in Indian Eastern Himalayas: implications on ecosystem services, conservation and livelihoods

Forest typology

Subsistence value1,+1

Economic value1,+2

Cultural value1,+3

Ecological value1,+4

Sum of ranks

Rank of sum

Indicative indicators for valuation2

Score

Rank

Score

Rank

Score

Rank

Score

Rank

Morang

10

I

6

V

10

I

10

I

8

I

1

Regpi

9

II

8

III

9

II

9

II

9

II

2

Monku

4

VII

7

IV

6

V

7

IV

20

VII

3

Mosam

7

IV

8

III

8

III

8

III

13

IV

4

Sirung

7

IV

6

V

7

IV

8

III

16

V

5

Homegardens

8

III

8

III

7

IV

9

II

12

III

6

Orange garden

6

V

10

I

5

VI

5

VI

18

VI

7

Pineapple gardens

5

VI

9

II

4

VII

5

VI

21

VIII

8

Traditional tea-garden

8

III

7

IV

5

VI

6

V

18

VI

9

Village boundary forests

4

VII

3

VI

6

V

7

IV

22

IX

10

  1. The scoring was done on 1 to 10 scale on consensus basis applying FGD (focus group discussions) with key knowledge holders (average 12 member) on four parameters (subsistence to ecological values) against a particular forest typology
  2. 1The scoring of value of a particular parameter was based a range of biophysical, cultural and other indicators
  3. 2The list of indicative indicators thematically patternized (Braun and Clarke 2006; Stringer et al. 2017) to assign the scores as provided in Additional file 1: Table S.5 in S1
  4. +1A forest which is often used in both normal and abnormal conditions for survival
  5. +2When a particular forest is accessed for collection of species (plant and animals) specially for market sale
  6. +3When a forest is accessed more for fulfilling needs of hunting, fishing, spiritual acts, accessing to meet needs of special foods, etc.
  7. +4When a forest components (plant, animals, soil, water, etc.) are treated to play critical roles in conservation of not only biodiversity, but also maintaining tangible and non-tangible ecosystem services (e.g., water for irrigation and drinking, maintain endangered and rare species)