Skip to main content

Table 2 Experiments on retention forestry in Finland and Sweden. The Finnish experiments are located in the middle boreal biome and the Swedish experiment in the north boreal biome (Ahti et al. 1968). The Finnish experiments are ordered according to establishment year. For location of experiments, see Fig. 2, and for photos from a selection of experiments, see Fig. 3. Year establishment year, Age stand age at establishment (year), NS Norway spruce Picea abies, SP Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Blocks, size = number of blocks or stands, and their size ranges. LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland, Metsähallitus Finnish forest and park services, Metsäteho Metsäteho Ltd., a research and development company by Finnish forest industry organizations, UEF University of Eastern Finland, UH University of Helsinki, Skogforsk Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. For explanation of Finnish experiment names, see the section “Abbreviations” in the text

From: Research on retention forestry in Northern Europe

Experiments

Characteristics

 

Year

Age, tree species

Blocks, size

Treatments

Response variables

Responsible

Information

MONTA (East and West) (Finland)

1995

90, NS

48, 1–2 ha

Clear felling, retention felling (up to 0.02 ha patches), gap felling, selection felling

Wood-inhabiting fungi, vascular plants, lichens, mosses, liverworts, beetles, spiders, ants, land snails, timber volume, sapling establishment, coarse woody debris

LUKE, Metsäteho, UH

Jalonen and Vanha-Majamaa 2001

RETREE (Finland)

1997

90, NS

11, 1–3 ha

Retention of 0.1–0.6 ha patches in clear-felled stands

Vascular plants, lichens, mosses, liverworts, beetles, spiders, land snails, timber volume, sapling establishment, coarse woody debris

LUKE, UH

Matveinen-Huju et al. 2006

FIRE (Finland)

2000

150, SP

24, 3–5 ha

Retention of different intensity (0, 10, or 50 m3/ha), burning

Polypore and other fungi, beetles, flat bugs, pollinators, small mammals, ungulates, lichens, tree monitoring, tree regeneration, dendrochronology

UEF

Hyvärinen et al. 2005

EVO (Finland)

2001

90, NS

24, 1–3 ha

Down wood retention (5, 30, or 60 m3/ha), standing tree retention (50 m3/ha), burning

Wood-inhabiting fungi, vascular plants, lichens, mosses, liverworts, beetles, timber volume, sapling establishment, coarse woody debris

LUKE, UH

Vanha-Majamaa et al. 2007

DISTDYN (East and West) (Finland)

2009

90, NS/SP

12, 200–300 ha

Selection felling, gap felling, clear felling, deadwood addition. 5–20% retention volume

Wood-inhabiting fungi, vascular plants (some lichens and mosses), beetles, timber volume, sapling establishment

LUKE, Metsähallitus, UEF, UH

Koivula et al. 2014

Effaråsen (Sweden)

2012

120, SP

24, 5–14 ha

Retention gradient (3–100% volume) and burning

Wood-inhabiting fungi, mycorrhiza fungi, epixylic lichens, beetles, timber volume, logging performance and opportunity costs, carbon stock, albedo

Skogforsk

Djupström and Weslien 2019