From: Understanding stakeholder preferences for managing red foxes in different situations
Strategy/scenario | General public (M) | Farmers (M) | Hunters (M) | Farmers-hunters (M) | Multivariate Wilks’λ | Within-subject Greenhouse-Geisser | Partial eta squared (ηp2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No action | |||||||
Scenario 1 | – 0.60 A | – 0.96 A | – 0.75 A | – 1.35 A | 49.301* | 89.793* | 0.137 |
Scenario 2 | 0.28 B | – 0.38 B | – 1.13 AB | – 1.47 A |  |  |  |
Scenario 3 | – 1.41 C | – 1.46 C | – 1.69 B | – 1.53 A |  |  |  |
Culling at the den | |||||||
Scenario 1 | – 1.42 A | – 0.79 A | – 0.31 A | – 0.29 A | 29.819* | 54.512* | 0.090 |
Scenario 2 | – 1.38 A | – 0.72 A | 0.38 A | 0.53 A |  |  |  |
Scenario 3 | – 0.97 B | – 0.18 B | 0.00 A | 0.41 A |  |  |  |
Trapping or snaring | |||||||
Scenario 1 | – 1.63 A | – 1.09 A | – 0.31 A | – 0.18 A | 25.131* | 31.368* | 0.073 |
Scenario 2 | – 1.50 A | – 1.10 A | 0.19 A | 0.24 A |  |  |  |
Scenario 3 | – 1.27 B | – 0.90 A | 0.36 A | 0.65 A |  |  |  |
Hunting | |||||||
Scenario 1 | – 1.32 A | – 0.87 A | – 0.19 A | 0.00 A | 47.730* | 83.901* | 0.137 |
Scenario 2 | – 1.32 A | – 0.81 A | 1.31 B | 1.41 B |  |  |  |
Scenario 3 | – 1.01 B | – 0.52 A | 0.88 B | 1.18 B |  |  |  |
Shooting | |||||||
Scenario 1 | – 1.62 A | – 1.44 A | – 1.00 A | – 0.71 A | 43.271* | 50.622* | 0.123 |
Scenario 2 | – 1.57 A | – 1.17 AB | – 0.19 AB | 0.41 B |  |  |  |
Scenario 3 | – 1.45 A | – 1.08 B | – 0.06 B | 0.12 AB |  |  |  |