Skip to main content

Table 4 Performances of the Negative Binomial Hurdle models (hurdle and count parts) evaluated for the three study regions and each of the five subsamples

From: Modeling fire ignition probability and frequency using Hurdle models: a cross-regional study in Southern Europe

 

Hurdle part

Count part

AUC value

Prediction accuracy (%)

Pearson correlation coefficient

RMSE

c)

s)

a)

c)

s)

a)

c)

s)

a)

c)

s)

a)

S1

0.72

0.80

0.81

0.67

0.73

0.78

0.23

0.41

0.35

0.73

2.99

0.90

S2

0.71

0.81

0.83

0.66

0.74

0.71

0.13

0.40

0.32

0.82

3.11

0.83

S3

0.71

0.79

0.84

0.66

0.72

0.79

0.15

0.43

0.39

0.77

2.85

0.79

S4

0.72

0.81

0.83

0.70

0.74

0.76

0.22

0.43

0.35

0.84

2.86

0.85

S5

0.72

0.80

0.83

0.62

0.72

0.76

0.20

0.43

0.33

0.74

2.85

0.81

ED

0.71

0.80

0.83

0.66

0.73

0.76

0.23

0.43

0.36

0.76

2.85

0.81

  1. c) Catalonia, s) Sardinia, a) Apulia, AUC area under the curve, S1–S5 subsamples, ED entire dataset, RMSE root mean square error