Table 2 Pairwise comparison matrix
From: Water resilience mapping of Chennai, India using analytical hierarchy process
Criteria | SD | GM | DD | DW | FID | LULC | USN | WSN | RF | PWS | DSW | PD | SP | NDVI | NDWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
GM | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
DD | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
DW | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
FID | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
LULC | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
USN | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
WSN | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
RF | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
PWS | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
DSW | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
PD | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
SP | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
NDVI | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 |
NDWI | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 1 |