Skip to main content

Table 1 Tree species information of selected stands in secondary forests

From: Effects of logging on the trade-off between seed and sprout regeneration of dominant woody species in secondary forests of the Natural Forest Protection Project of China

Species

Abbreviation

Type of value

Importance values in study area (%)

Existence form in the sample plots

Residual trees

Seeds

Seedlings

Sprouts

Acer barbinerve Maxim

AB

3

3.0

√

√

√

√

Acer mono Maxim

AM

1,3

14.2

√

√

√

√

Acer pseudosieboldianum (Pax) Komarov

AP

1,3

18.6

√

√

√

√

Acer tegmentosum Maxim

ATe

1,3

3.9

√

√

  

Acer triflorum Komarov

ATr

1,3

–

√

√

  

Betula dahurica Pall

BD

1

–

√

√

√

√

Betula yphylla Suk

BY

1

–

√

√

Carpinus cordata BI

CCo

3

4.2

√

 

√

√

Cornus controversa Hemsley

CC

3

*

√

√

√

√

Corylus mandshurica Maxim

CM

1

–

√

 

√

 

Cerasus serrulate (Lindl.) G. Don ex London

CS

3

–

√

 

√

 

Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr

FM

1,2

3.1

√

√

√

√

Fraxinus rhynchophylla (Hance) E. Murray

FR

1,3

3.2

√

√

√

√

Juglans mandshurica Maxim

JM

1,2

6.4

√

√

√

√

Phellodendron amurense Rupr

PA

1,2

–

√

 

√

 

Padus avium Miller

PAv

3

–

√

 

√

 

Populus davidiana Dode

PD

1

–

√

 

√

√

Pinus koraiensis Siebold et Zuccarini

PK

1,2,3

–

√

 

√

 

Quercus mongolica Fischer ex Ledebour

QM

1,2,3

12.1

√

√

√

√

Ribes mandshuricum (Maxim.) Kom

RM

1

–

√

 

√

 

Sorbus alnifolia (Sieb. et Zucc.) K. Koch

SA

1,3

–

√

√

√

 

Syringa reticulata subsp. amurensis (Rupr.) P. S. Green & M. C. Chang

SR

1,3

–

√

 

√

√

Sambucus williamsii Hance

SW

1

–

√

 

√

 

Tilia mandshurica Rupr. et Maxim

TM

1,3

–

√

√

 

√

Ulmus davidiana var. japonica (Rehd.) Nakai

UD

1

–

√

√

√

√

Ulmus laciniata (Trautv.) Mayr

UL

1,3

3.7

√

  

√

  1. The type of value is determined according to Flora of China (www.iplant.cn). 1 = the economic tree species; 2 = the national protected plants; 3 = the ornamental tree species. Importance values in study area are cited from Mao et al. (2007)
  2. *The importance value of CC is < 0.03, but it is also a major tree in study area (Zhu et al. 2010)