Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity index and efficiency ratio between each soil quality index value and soil indicators

From: Soil quality estimation using environmental covariates and predictive models: an example from tropical soils of Nigeria

Indicators/indices

MDS_L

MDS_NL

TDS_L

TDS_NL

Pearson correlation

    

 pH

  

 − 0.425**

 − 0.411**

 SOC

0.808**

0.934**

0.683**

0.745**

 Ks

  

0.153 NS

0.176 NS

 \(\rho_{b}\)

  

 − 0.592**

 − 0.602**

 MC

  

0.445**

0.480**

 Porosity

  

0.473**

0.408**

 MWD

0.230*

0.406**

0.140 NS

0.439**

 SSI

0.485**

0.690**

0.378**

0.339**

 Sand

 − 0.127NS

 − 0.064 NS

 − 0.137

 − 0.337**

 Silt

  

0.195*

0.289**

 Clay

  

 − 0.044 NS

0.192*

 ER (%) values

75

75

72.72

90.90

 ER rank

2

2

3

1

 SI values

8.60

3.38

2.67

2.48

 SI rank

1

2

3

4

 Rank scores

3

4

6

5

 Final ranking

1

2

4

3

  1. NS  Not significant
  2. * and ** mean correlation is significant at the 1% and 5% level respectively (2-tailed)