Variables | Perceptions towards problems with the existing PFM system | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ć | t | P value | |
Intercept | ā1.41 | 1.28 | ā |
Sex (femaleā=ā1 and maleā=ā2) | 0.13 | 1.09 | 0.28 |
Age | 3.19 | 2.75a | 0.003 |
Levels of education | ā0.17 | ā0.87 | 0.39 |
Family size per household | ā0.54 | ā3.02a | 0.002 |
Occupation | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Annual income (ETB) | ā0.25 | ā1.30 | 0.20 |
Livestock ownership (Yesā=ā2) | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.82 |
Had enough grazing land (Yesā=ā2) | 0.23 | 1.49 | 0.14 |
Wanted to keep more livestock in the future (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.78 | ā0.56 | 0.58 |
Had shortage of fodder for livestock (Yesā=ā2) | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.69 |
Length of duration of residence in the area (years) | ā3.30 | ā2.55a | 0.003 |
History of settlement | ā1.79 | ā2.32a | 0.003 |
Had the plan to stay in the area in the future | 0.22 | 2.01a | 0.003 |
Private land ownership (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.13 | ā0.38 | 0.71 |
Allocated land for woodlot plantation (Yesā=ā2) | 0.45 | 4.22a | 0.000 |
Had shortage of fuelwood (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.21 | ā1.43 | 0.16 |
Benefited due to PFM (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.13 | ā1.08 | 0.29 |
Knowledge of the respondents on WWF (Yesā=ā2) | ā0.002 | ā0.02 | 1.0 |
Distance between the edge of WWF and the residential area of the respondents | 0.28 | 1.36 | 0.18 |
Had a tree planting and growing tradition (Yesā=ā2) | 0.90 | 4.35a | 0.0001 |