Skip to main content

Table 5 Mass balances of condensed tannins (ECT and BCT: extractable and bound forms, respectively) in leaf litter of three mangrove species before and after 216 h leaching and their dynamic changes in leachates during the leaching experiment

From: Microcosm study on fate and dynamics of mangrove tannins during leaf litter leaching

Species

Dynamics of ECT and BCT in leaf litter (mg)

Theoretical calculation value of ECT in leachates (mg)c

Dynamics of ECT in leachates from different leaching processes (mg)

P (%)d

Decreases of ECTa

Increases of BCTb

6 h

12 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

96 h

120 h

144 h

168 h

192 h

216 h

Ko

654.8 ± 10.5 (93.7%)

311.6 ± 10.1 (47.6%)

343.2 ± 10.3 (52.4%)

0.1

1.1

7.9

11.8

21.7

24.1

28.6

19.6

13.9

7.2

4.3

8.3

Ac

739.2 ± 22.9 (84.7%)

299.0 ± 11.7 (40.4%)

440.2 ± 15.5 (59.6%)

8.0

19.3

22.7

25.8

30.7

37.3

39.0

41.2

30.4

16.4

13.2

9.4

Sa

92.0 ± 5.3 (76.0%)

4.0 ± 0.5 (4.3%)

88.0 ± 4.7 (95.7%)

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.2

2.6

2.7

3.2

4.0

6.8

4.8

4.1

7.7

  1. aDecrease of ECT = weight of ECT in leaf litter before leaching – after leaching, and percentage (value in bracket) = decrease of ECT/Total ECT before leaching
  2. bIncreases of BCT = weight of BCT in leaf litter after leaching – before leaching, and percentage (value in bracket) = increase of BCT/decrease of ECT
  3. cCalculated value of ECT in leachates = decrease of ECT – increase of BCT, and percentages (value in bracket) = ECT in leachate / decrease of ECT
  4. dP means the proportion = peak value of ECT in leachate/theoretically calculated value of ECT in leachate after leaching
  5. The bold figure in each line indicates the peak value of ECT weight in leachate
  6. Ko: K. obovata, Ac: A. corniculatum, and Sa: S. apetala