Skip to main content

Table 2 Energy balance closure statistics at the LBA flux sites and ET measurement results showing uncertainty compared to ground truth data. The standard deviation is indicated between brackets

From: The spatial variability of actual evapotranspiration across the Amazon River Basin based on remote sensing products validated with flux towers

Tower code

Average energy balance closure, Rn – G – H − λE

(W/m2)

Average energy balance closure, {(H + λE)/(Rn − G)} × 100% (%)

Direct method

(mm/month)

Residual method

(mm/month)

Bowen ratio method

(mm/month)

ET difference between methods

(mm/month)

K34

17.9

86

102.9 (17.5)

124.0 (18.9)

120.2 (19.1)

21.1

K67

2.3

97

99.7 (18.8)

108.5 (40.5)

110.4 (63.4)

10.7

K77

− 18.5

116

106.4 (26.5)

80.9 (27.4)

88.7 (22.6)

25.5

K83

5.6

95

133.9 (6.8)

146.9 (8.9)

144.1 (7.3)

13.0

BAN

12.8

90

111.6 (18.9)

128.1 (11.1)

123.6 (11.6)

16.5