Fig. 2From: Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del FuegoComponents of carbon content (%) classified according each category and biomass allocation (see Table 1) showing primary unmanaged forests (PF) and stands under variable retention harvesting (VRH) classified according the different retention types (AG: aggregated retention, DR: dispersed retention). The data are the mean of all the stands combining the years-after-harvesting samplings. Inner ring discriminates between biomass allocations (above- and below-ground), while outer ring shows category x biomass allocation sub-componentsBack to article page