Setting large- and medium-sized mammal restoration goals in a last mountain Chaco remnant from central Argentina

Ecological Processes

Table 1 Mammals ≥ 2 kg camera-trapped in the study area

Species	Common name	Mass (kg)	Diet	N	N_corr	SRA	Estimated density (ind km^–2)	Estimated biomass (kg km^–2)
Native
Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae
Didelphis albiventris^LC	White-eared opossum	2	OMN	17	95	4.0	0.43	0.9
Carnivora: Felidae
Leopardus geoffroyi^VU	Geoffroy’s cat	6.9	CAR	34	86	3.6	0.38	2.7
Herpailurus yagouaroundi^VU	Jaguarundi	9	CAR	2	5	0.2	0.02	0.2
Puma concolor^VU	Puma	70	CAR	12	17	0.7	0.08	5.3
Carnivora: Canidae
Lycalopex gymnocercus^LC	Pampas fox	8	OMN	93	222	9.3	0.99	7.9
Carnivora: Menphitidae
Conepatus chinga^LC	Molina’s Hog-nosed skunk	3	INS	46	279	7.5	0.80	2.4
Carnivora: Mustelidae
Galictis cuja^NT	Lesser grison	2.5	CAR	2	9	0.4	0.04	0.1
Cetartiodactyla: Tayassuidae
Pecari tajacu^EN	Collared peccary	35	HER	182	297	12.4	1.33	46.5
Non-native
Carnivora: Canidae
Canis familiaris	Dog	15	CAR	105	207	8.7	0.93	13.9
Cetartiodactyla: Suidae
Sus scrofa	Wild boar	150	HER	5	7	0.3	0.03	4.7
Artiodactyla: Bovidae
Bos taurus	Cattle	800	HER	1006	1117	46.9	5.00	4000
Perissodactyla: Equidae
Equus caballus	Horse	550	HER	125	143	6.0	0.64	352

We show taxonomic order, family and scientific name, conservation status as a superscript, common name, individual mass as used in the calculations, main diet, abundance of photo-trapped animals (N), corrected abundance of photo-trapped animals (N_corr), species relative abundance (SRA), estimated density of individuals (ind km⁻²) and estimated biomass (kg km⁻²) as evaluated using corrected abundances. Conservation status according to Torres and Tamburini (2018): EN endangered, VU vulnerable, NT near threatened and LC least concern. Main diet: HER herbivore, OMN omnivore, INS insectivore, CAR carnivore