- Open Access
Decoupling effect and driving factors of carbon footprint in megacity Wuhan, Central China
Ecological Processes volume 12, Article number: 23 (2023)
China’s 35 largest cities, including Wuhan, are inhabited by approximately 18% of the Chinese population, and account for 40% energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Wuhan is the only sub-provincial city in Central China and, as the eighth largest economy nationwide, has experienced a notable increase in energy consumption. However, major knowledge gaps exist in understanding the nexus of economic development and carbon footprint and their drivers in Wuhan.
We studied Wuhan for the evolutionary characteristics of its carbon footprint (CF), the decoupling relationship between economic development and CF, and the essential drivers of CF. Based on the CF model, we quantified the dynamic trends of CF, carbon carrying capacity, carbon deficit, and carbon deficit pressure index from 2001 to 2020. We also adopted a decoupling model to clarify the coupled dynamics among total CF, its accounts, and economic development. We used the partial least squares method to analyze the influencing factors of Wuhan’s CF and determine the main drivers.
The CF of Wuhan increased from 36.01 million t CO2eq in 2001 to 70.07 million t CO2eq in 2020, a growth rate of 94.61%, which was much faster than that of the carbon carrying capacity. The energy consumption account (84.15%) far exceeded other accounts, and was mostly contributed by raw coal, coke, and crude oil. The carbon deficit pressure index fluctuated in the range of 8.44–6.74%, indicating that Wuhan was in the relief zone and the mild enhancement zone during 2001–2020. Around the same time, Wuhan was in a transition stage between weak and strong CF decoupling and economic growth. The main driving factor of CF growth was the urban per capita residential building area, while energy consumption per unit of GDP was responsible for the CF decline.
Our research highlights the interaction of urban ecological and economic systems, and that Wuhan’s CF changes were mainly affected by four factors: city size, economic development, social consumption, and technological progress. The findings are of realistic significance in promoting low-carbon urban development and improving the city’s sustainability, and the related policies can offer an excellent benchmark for other cities with similar challenges.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission over many years is one of the most important factors affecting climate change, and also is one of the crucial environmental concerns of humankind. These concerns have become more severe in China following economic development and population growth. Cities are centers of politics, economy, culture, population, and transportation (Lu et al. 2016). Over the past decades, urbanization in China, as a developing country, began later than in other places but has experienced dramatically rapid expansion, which has also induced the development of megacities (Fang et al. 2016). Since the reform and opening up, China’s urbanization rate has increased from 17.92% to 63.89% in 2020 (Cai et al. 2020). Meanwhile, urban land area in China has increased by more than eight times (from 7438 to 60,721 km2) between 1981 and 2020. Notably, China’s 35 largest cities, such as Wuhan, include approximately 18% of the population, and account for 40% of the energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Wang et al. 2018). Moreover, fulfilling the national commitment to reduce carbon emission intensity by approximately 65% relative to 2005 has been a great barrier. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze GHG emission trends and clarify the essential drivers, which also contribute to government scientific policies.
To study GHG emissions from megacities, one of the common international approaches is using the carbon footprint (CF). CF originated from the ecological footprint concept and later became an independent concept (East 2008). It is a comprehensive indicator to measure the CO2 or GHG emissions generated during production and the full lifecycle (Pan and Zhang 2021). More importantly, CF is a straightforward method that can reflect the influence of human activities on ecosystems and further reveal the interactions between people and ecosystems. Based on these benefits, CF has received increasing attention from researchers, who have mainly focused on the definitions and methodologies of CF (Lombardi et al. 2017), quantification of CF at different scales (Long et al. 2019), CF of various crop production from different areas (Zhang et al. 2017; Tian et al. 2021), analysis of CF drivers and decomposition models (Li et al. 2022a, b), and the nexus of CF and economic development (Mi et al. 2020). Previous studies have already demonstrated the usefulness of CF and offered a scientific basis for further research. However, there is a shortcoming: the key factors driving CF changes are difficult to determine. To remedy this deficiency, the application of CF is usually combined with other approaches, such as input–output analysis (Su et al. 2017), partial least squares (PLS) method (Huang 2019), structural decomposition analysis (Huang et al. 2019), and logarithmic mean Divisia index method (Chong et al. 2015; Zhen et al. 2017). Among them, the PLS method complements CF and overcomes its drawbacks (Yang et al. 2015).
As proposed by Wold and Albano in 1983, the PLS method has become a widely used tool in stoichiometry, industrial design, market analysis, economics, and biomedicine (Bayer et al. 2012). The method can cope with multicollinearity problems even when the number of variables is high, and it simultaneously integrates multiple regression, principal component analysis, and canonical correlation analysis into a model (Monecke and Leisch 2012). More importantly, it can decompose and screen data information in the system, extract the aggregate variables having the greatest impact on the dependent variable, and identify the information and noise in the modeling process (Yang et al. 2015); thus, it appears to be more appropriate in analyzing CF drivers than other approaches. As such, we use the PLS method to analyze the essential drivers of CF and clarify the nexus of carbon emission reduction and economic development. Decoupling analysis is an effective tool to explore the relationships among energy, environment, and economy (Grand 2016). Moreover, the decoupling model is often combined with decomposition methods, such as the PLS method. The PLS method can identify the important drivers for CF, and decoupling analysis allows us to understand the contribution of these factors to the evolution of the decoupling process in a given city. However, few studies have focused on the decoupling mechanism of economic development and CF. In this regard, several questions need to be answered. For example, the decoupling mechanism between CF and GDP year-by-year is unknown as are the essential decoupling drivers. These questions are pivotal for a city to establish energy-saving and carbon emission reduction policies, especially for a large city like a megacity.
To achieve a win–win situation for economic growth and environmental improvement, it is necessary to clarify the main factors driving the CF in Wuhan and the characteristics of various factors at different stages of economic development and propose carbon emission policies for these different stages. The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantitatively analyze the dynamic trends of CF, carbon carrying capacity (CC), and carbon deficit (CD) in Wuhan during 2001–2020; (2) identify the decoupling relationship between the total CF and its accounts and economic development in Wuhan; and (3) find out the main driving factors of CF changes in the region. This study offers an excellent benchmark for the government to evaluate the influence of their policies on carbon emission mitigation, and also helps to elaborate more suitable polices for achieving sustainable development of ecosystems and economic and social systems.
Materials and methods
Overview of Wuhan, China
Wuhan City, which lies between 29° 58′–31° 22′ N and 113° 41′–115° 05′ E, is located in central China (Fig. 1). Wuhan is the political, economic, and cultural center of Hubei Province and is also the only sub-provincial city in Central China. The city has jurisdiction over thirteen districts, with a total area of 8569.15 km2 and home to 13.65 million people. As the eighth largest economy nationwide, its GDP reached 1771.68 billion RMB in 2021 (Li et al. 2022a, b). The added value of its primary, secondary, and tertiary industries increased from 8.14 billion RMB, 53.33 billion RMB, and 59.22 billion RMB in 2000 to 40.22 billion RMB, 555.75 billion RMB, and 965.64 billion RMB in 2020. The composition of the three industries is 2.6:35.6:61.8 (Wuhan Statistics Bureau 2021). The rapid economic development of Wuhan induced an obvious increase in energy consumption. By 2020, the usage of coal (2075.47 × 104 t) and natural gas (144,313.62 × 104 m3) increased nearly two times and 210 times, respectively, compared to 2000.
Carbon footprint model
In this study, we adopted a combination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission inventory and Guidelines for the Preparation of Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories to account for regional GHG emissions. We modified the carbon footprint model and constructed four accounts based on emission sources to analyze the CF of Wuhan, which including the energy consumption (CFe), industrial production process (CFp), polluting emission (CFw), and livestock accounts (CFl). The formula used was as follows:
Energy consumption account
Carbon emissions from fossil energy are mainly emitted as CO2, with only a small amount in the form of CH4 and N2O. Hence, our study only considered CO2 emissions in the energy consumption account. According to the IPCC guidelines 2006, Eqs. (2), (3), and (4) were formulated to calculate CFe for fossil fuel combustion:
where CFe1 and CFe2 are the CF from the fixed and mobile source of the energy consumption account, respectively.
where ACj refers to the amount of the jth fuel (104 t or 104 m3); NCVj, EFj, and COFj are shown in Additional file 1: Table S2; 10–6 indicates the unit conversion factor; and 44/12 refers to the ratio of CO2 emission and carbon chemical molecular weight:
where VPi, VMTi, FEig/d, and EFg/d refer to the number, annual average mileage (km/vehicle), fuel economy (L/km), and carbon emission factor (t C/t) of the ith vehicle, respectively, and g and d represent gasoline and diesel.
Industrial production process account
Since 1985, China has become the largest global producer and consumer of cement (Shen et al. 2016). During industrial production, the largest fraction of carbon emissions is related to cement output, which has been calculated (Kajaste and Hurme 2016). However, fossil fuels from industrial production processes include CO2 emitted by the fuel used; thus, carbon emissions from the decomposition and transformation of raw materials are considered in this study. The emission factor of clinker is 0.538 t CO2/t, which can be retrieved from the Guidelines for the Preparation of Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories:
where Sy refers to the output of Portland cement clinker, and D represents the emission factor of clinker.
Polluting emission account
Owing to the standardized calculation process and accurate results, we adopted the first-order attenuation method to calculate GHG emissions of solid waste, which has also been recommended by the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory:
where DDOCmdT represents the decomposable carbon in Tyear landfill in an anaerobic environment, and WT indicates the volume of industrial solid waste treated in Tyear (104 t). DOC, DOCf, and MCF were considered using the method proposed by Qu and Yang (2011):
where Fa and Fb are the volume proportions of CH4 and CO2 in the total gas generated during landfill, respectively; 16/12 indicates the ratio of CH4 emissions to carbon chemical molecular weight; and 44/12 represents the ratio of CO2 emissions to carbon chemical molecular weight.
In this study, CFw1, CFw2, and CFw3 represent the emissions of solid waste, CH4, and N2O (104 t), respectively. CFw1 can be calculated as the sum of CH4,emission,T and CO2,emission,T:
where RT refers to the recovery of CH4 and CO2, and OXT is the oxidation factor:
where T refers to the degradable organic matter (BOD) and can be obtained by multiplying the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal by the average value of BOD/COD. MCF represents the correction factor of methane, R indicates the recovery of CH4:
where P refers to the human population, Pr indicates the per capita consumption of protein, FNPR represents the nitrogen mass in protein, FNON–CON is the factor for non-consumed protein, FIND–COM indicates the emission factor of protein, NS represents the nitrogen disposed of sludge, and EFE refers to the emission factor of N2O.
Agriculture provides 24% of the global GHG emissions and still growing each year (Bai et al. 2018). Approximately 32.56 × 109 t of CO2eq GHG is derived from livestock and its by-products, accounting for 51% of global emissions. Therefore, the CF of livestock should be included in the calculation of Wuhan’s CF, which plays a pivotal role in evaluating the policies of carbon emission mitigation. In addition, CH4 accounts for about 44% of carbon emissions from livestock, so we focused on calculating CH4 emissions from livestock:
where ECH4,enteric,i and EFCH4,enteric,i refer to the discharge amount and emissions factor of methane, respectively, and APi is the number of the ith animal.
Carbon carrying capacity
CC is defined as the fixed CO2 absorbed by various vegetation types in a certain region every year (Mancini et al. 2016). Net ecosystem productivity (NEP) refers to the carbon sequestration capacity of vegetation. The main formula for calculating the CC of Wuhan is as follows (Fu et al. 2020):
where M refers to the area of forests (104 hm2); N indicates the area of grasslands (104 hm2), NEPf and NEPg are the carbon sequestration abilities of forests and grasslands, respectively; 44/12 represents the conversion coefficient of C; λ refers to the correction factor; Pj indicates the production of crops (104 t); z represents the conversion coefficient; and ωj and Oj are the moisture content and economic coefficient of crops, respectively.
Carbon deficit and carbon deficit pressure index
The CD in a region is the residual between CF and CC:
If CD > 0, the carbon emissions exceed the carrying capacity and carbon surplus in the area, which further warms the climate. If CD = 0, the carbon budget is balanced. If CD < 0, the sum of the fixed CO2 can be absorbed by carbon sinks in the area, which is conducive to slowing the warming process.
According to Lu et al. (2013), the CD pressure index (CDI) can be calculated using Eq. (20):
The classification of CDI change is designed as in Table 1.
Tapio’s decoupling model
The decoupling model is employed to explore the nexus of economic development and energy consumption (Pan and Zhang 2021). Currently, the most popular methods used for decoupling involve the OECD decoupling model and Tapio’s decoupling model (Grand 2016). However, the former has some disadvantages, such as measurement errors in decoupling, because factors are chosen randomly or do not fully reveal the decoupling effect. To remedy these defects, Tapio (2005) proposed a decoupling model, which specifies that decoupling states are categorized into eight sub-categories, depending on the values of αn (CF and GDP). The standard and explanation of decoupling relationship are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The formula used was as follows:
where αn refers to the decoupling elasticity index. The subscripts n and n–1 represent the year n and n–1.
Partial least squares regression
PLS regression is an invaluable method when independent variables have strong collinearity (Jia et al. 2009). In the model, the CF of Wuhan was selected as the dependent variable Y, and independent variables included X1, X2, …, Xp for population, GDP, and other factors. Furthermore, the variable importance plot (VIP) value reflects the importance of X1, X2, …, Xp to Y. The higher the VIP, the greater the influence of the variable on the dependent variable.
In this study, we adopted Simca-P 11.5 (Umetrics, Ume, Sweden) to analyze the major drivers of Wuhan’s CF. In many cases, Kaya’s identity has also been widely used for determining CF drivers (Jia et al. 2009). To objectively reflect the important CF change factors, researchers have optimized the critical factors of Kaya’s identity. For instance, Jia et al. (2009) found that human population, GDP, and percentage of urban population were the key drivers of Henan’s CF. Huang et al. (2021) reported that population scale, economic development, technological level, and vegetation quality were the four frameworks driving CF change. For the crucial factors influencing Wuhan’s CF changes, we selected mainly from the following categories: city size, economic development, social consumption, and technological progress. The ten sub-categories are listed in Table 2.
First, for the energy consumption account, the consumptions of various fuels are obtained from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory and the China Energy Statistical Yearbook (see Additional file 1: Table S2). The NCV, EF, and COF of energy refer to the China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Data on civil vehicles are obtained from the Wuhan Statistical Yearbook (2002–2021), and the VMT, FE, and EF of the vehicle are based on the results of He et al. (2005). For the industrial production process account, the output of “Portland Cement Clinker” is not available in Wuhan Statistical Yearbook, so it was replaced by the output of “Cement.”
Second, the sources of pollution emissions were divided into municipal solid waste, industrial solid waste, urban domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater discharge. Solid wastes in most cities were landfilled; thus, we only calculated GHG emissions from landfill treatment. During the treatment of solid waste, the emissions mainly comprised CO2 and CH4, with little O2, N2, H2S, and other GHG. Therefore, for the pollution emission account, we only calculated the emissions of CO2 and CH4. Based on the given data availability, the amount of “Municipal Solid Waste” was replaced with “Treatment Capacity of Living Garbage.” When calculating the GHG emissions from industrial solid waste, the “Volume of Industrial Solid Wastes Treated” was obtained from the Wuhan Municipal Solid Waste Pollution Prevention and Control Information Announcement. Furthermore, CH4 and N2O have 21 and 310 folds the warming potential of CO2, respectively. The values of DOC, DOCf, MCF, F, and OX were 0.14, 0.5, 1, 0.5, and 0, respectively, in the disposal of municipal solid waste, whereas they were 0.15, 0.5, 1, 0.5, and 0, respectively, in the disposal of industrial solid waste (Qu and Yang 2011). When calculating CH4 and N2O emissions from wastewater treatment, the values of B0, MCF, R, FNPR, FNON–CON, FIND–COM, NS, and EFE were 0.6, 0.165, 0, 0.16, 1.1, 1.25, 0, and 0.005, respectively, based on the research by Zhang et al. (2014). For the livestock account, based on the main livestock types in Wuhan, methane emissions from intestinal fermentation and feces were calculated. The CH4 emission factors were obtained from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventory and the Guidelines for the Preparation of Provincial Greenhouse Gas Inventories (see Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4).
Third, land type was used to calculate the CC, including forestland, grassland, and cropland. According to Yang and Meng (2019), the values of NEPf, NEPg, λ, and z were 13.97, 3.48, 0.07, and 0.5, respectively. When calculating CC, data on areas of forestland and grassland were obtained from the Report on the State of Greening in Wuhan (Wuhan Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry) and the General Land Use Planning in Wuhan (2006–2020). Using these data may not avoid discordance with the actual CC; however, it is undeniable that the authority, availability, and completeness of data have been comprehensively evaluated. In addition, the selection of ωj and Oj according to Yan et al. (2018) with the values is listed in the Appendix (Additional file 1: Table S5).
Carbon footprint, carbon carrying capacity, and carbon deficit analysis
The CF increased by 94.61% changing from 36.01 to 70.07 million t CO2eq during 2001–2020 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). From 2001 to 2006, CF exhibited rapid growth; after 2006, CF entered a period of fluctuating growth and exhibited a downward trend from 2020 onward. The CC of Wuhan fluctuated slightly between 2001 and 2007, and increased from 2.31 to 2.58 million t CO2eq. From 2008 to 2014, the CC decreased overall and remained essentially stable; after 2016, it reached 2.95 million t CO2eq, and then decreased gradually.
In the overall CF account, the energy consumption account occupied a dominant position, which showed an overall fluctuating upward trend (Fig. 2). The industrial production process account contributed the second largest share, an increase of 294.70%, and an average annual increase of 6.04%. The livestock account tended to be relatively stable before 2016 and then continuously decreased by 48.55% compared with 2015. The pollution emissions account showed erratic changes with alternate dips and rises, which fluctuated from 2.76 to 5.19 million t CO2eq with a growth rate of 88.09%.
From the perspective of energy consumption, industry had the greatest consumption, while transportation and residents accounted for a relatively small proportion (Fig. 2). Specifically, raw coal, coke, and crude oil contributed 96.06–99.47% to energy consumption, which dominated the CF of the industry. Municipal solid waste was the main contributor to the pollution emissions account and showed a fluctuating rising trend, followed by industrial solid waste and domestic sewage. Furthermore, the livestock account was dominated by methane, which was based on animal intestinal fermentation and feces. The CD of Wuhan exhibited an overall growth trend, from 33.70 million t CO2eq in 2001 to 67.85 million t CO2eq in 2020; the cumulative increase was 101.34%, with an average annual increase of 3.75% (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Correspondingly, the growth in CF far exceeded that in CC. During the study period, the change in Wuhan’s CDI fluctuated in the range [8.44%, 6.74%] (Table 3).
During the study period, Wuhan experienced four decoupling states of CF and GDP (Table 4). Correspondingly, weak decoupling, strong decoupling, and expansion negative decoupling appeared nine (52.94%), five (29.41%), and two (11.76%), respectively, while decay decoupling appeared only once. The nexus of the energy consumption account and GDP was consistent with the relationship between CF and GDP during all periods, except 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. From 2001 to 2020, weak decoupling, strong decoupling, expansion negative decoupling, and decay decoupling appeared eight, six, three, and one time, respectively, between the industrial production process account and GDP. The relationship between the pollution emission account and GDP experienced weak decoupling, strong decoupling, expansion negative decoupling, and decay decoupling during 2001–2020. The frequencies of occurrences were 42.11%, 26.32%, 26.32%, and 5.26%, respectively. Regarding the relationship between livestock account and GDP, strong decoupling and weak decoupling appeared ten (55.55%) and six (33.33%), respectively, while strong negative decoupling and expansion negative decoupling appeared only once.
Driving factors analysis
In the first PLS component extraction, the cross-connect effectiveness Q12 was 0.515 > 1–0.952 = 0.0975. When the second component was extracted, the cross-connect effectiveness Q22 was 0.466 > 0.0975. Therefore, the system extracted the first and second components, because the third component was − 0.0862. The explanation capacities of models X and Y were 0.982 and 0.823, Q2(cum) = 0.741 > 0.5, indicating that the regression model had a higher accuracy and stronger reliability.
In this study, samples were distributed in an ellipse based on the analysis principle of a singular point, suggesting that samples satisfied the requirements of the regression model and the result was reliable. The final standardized PLS regression equation is
VIP is generally applied to determine the statistical importance of independent variable X on dependent variable Y. It is widely accepted that VIP values greater than 0.85 indicate that the dependent variable is “important.” The VIP values of the independent variables both exceeded 0.85, and they may be significant driving factors of Wuhan’s CF (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The order of the driving factors was as follows (from high to low): X9 > X4 > X1 > X5 > X6 > X7 > X3 > X10 > X8 > X2.
Carbon footprint, carbon carrying capacity, and carbon deficit of Wuhan
Overall, the change in CF in Wuhan primarily comprised two parts: initial high growth and then fluctuating increase. Wuhan is an important industrial base in China and the largest economic center of Central China and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The rapid economic development noticeably promoted Wuhan’s CF. Among the accounts, industrial enterprises above a designated size constituted a substantial share of the energy consumption account and contributed the most to the growth of Wuhan’s CF. Similarly, Li et al. (2017) reported that the energy consumption account made the largest contribution to Xi’an’s CF. In all the study years, raw coal was responsible for most of the CF, followed by coke, crude oil, and diesel oil, which is similar to the result of Huang et al. (2021). Municipal solid waste was the dominant source contributing to the CF growth in the pollution emissions account, whereas other sources, including industrial solid waste and domestic sewage, occupied a small percentage (Fig. 2). “Waste siege” occurs in many Chinese cities, including Wuhan, due to the growing urban population and the rapid economic growth (Chen et al. 2019). In addition, the cause of the decrease in the livestock account may be due to the Delineation and Implementation Plan of Prohibited, Restricted, and Suitable Breeding Areas for Livestock and Poultry in Wuhan, which clearly proposes establishing prohibited and restricted areas after 2016 and leads to the reduction of livestock.
CD is the most common parameter used for understanding the carbon sink potential in a city and evaluating the eco-safety level of a region (Pan and Zhang 2021). In this study, CD presented a rapid growth trend and was greater than 0 during 2001–2020. This trend indicates that the CO2 emissions of Wuhan exceeded its carbon sink capacity. Wuhan is in a carbon surplus state, primarily because its economy and society are developing quickly and continuously, resulting in increasing energy demand and intensity. In addition to the CD, the CDI is also crucial for evaluating the influence of anthropogenic activities on regional ecosystems over a period of time (Cao et al. 2017). By the intensity of the CDI change, the area can be divided into relief CDI ≤ 0, mild enhancement 0 < CDI ≤ 100, moderate enhancement 100 < CDI ≤ 200, severe enhancement 200 < CDI ≤ 500, and extreme enhancement zones CDI > 500 (Lu et al. 2013). According to this standard, Wuhan was mainly in the relief and mild enhancement zones during 2001–2020. This result once again showed that Wuhan was in a carbon surplus state, even though the CDI value decreased slightly in certain years. Consequently, it is necessary to enhance the environmental quality of Wuhan based on the intensity of CDI change.
Relationship between the CF and economic growth in Wuhan
Decoupling analysis has been broadly applied to various fields, which can accurately determine the nexus of economic growth and CO2 emission in an area (Li et al. 2019). During the entire study period, Wuhan experienced different decoupling states. The relationship between CF and the GDP of Wuhan is unstable, with weak decoupling and strong decoupling occurring for much of the time. In 2001, influenced by the implementation of Wuhan’s “10th Five-Year Plan,” the growth in GDP and CF increased with the overall startup of various projects, and an expansion connection appeared. During 2002–2004, Wuhan’s economy slowed; however, its CF continued to grow. Consequently, the relationship between them changed to expansion negative decoupling. Meanwhile, China was approved for entry into the WTO, which may have resulted in international and domestic competition in the retail industry. From 2004 to 2019, Wuhan experienced weak decoupling, strong decoupling, and expansion connection, and then returned to weak decoupling (Table 4). During this period, Wuhan began to pay attention to energy-saving and emissions decrease, and was approved as the “resource-conserving and environment-friendly society” comprehensive reform experimental region in 2007. In addition, the country set Wuhan as one of its pilot cities for a national low-carbon city in 2012 and proposed that Wuhan should optimize its energy structure and promote low-carbon development of energy, industry, and construction. Furthermore, the “13th Five-Year Plan” and carbon peak action plan were implemented in Wuhan, which required implementation of a low-carbon circular economy. Such efforts have decelerated the growth in carbon emissions, while GDP has experienced a relatively rapid increase. In 2020, both GDP and the CF of energy consumption, industrial production processes, and pollution emissions decreased simultaneously; thus, the nexus among them presented decay decoupling. Notably, 2020 is a crucial time; the COVID-19 outbreak substantially affects all aspects of human productivity and life, and catastrophically influences China and the world economy.
Overall, the nexus of the energy consumption account and GDP is nearly identical to that of the relationship between CF and economic development. The relationship between livestock accounts and GDP is favorable, presenting weak decoupling and strong decoupling during most periods. Weak decoupling and strong decoupling occurred frequently within the relationship between the industrial production process account and GDP. The relationship between the pollution emission account and GDP mainly presented weak decoupling, strong decoupling, and expansion negative decoupling (Table 4). Under the background of rapid growth in the urban population and economy, the amount of municipal solid waste is continuously augmenting, which contributes to the pollution emission account growth. Moreover, due to the “11th Five-Year Plan” and the action of industrial energy conservation and emission reduction were carried out, and Wuhan has achieved good results in industrial structure adjustment, energy saving, and emission reduction. For this reason, the nexus of the industrial production process account and GDP tends to be favorable after 2008.
Driving factors of the carbon footprint in Wuhan
Regarding the social system, the urban per capita residential building area ranked first among the influential factors, and the VIP value was up to 1.44. The government adopted a range of measures to increase the urban per capita residential building area, such as the “11th Five-Year Plan” for urban spatial layout and the “12th Five-Year Plan” for housing development. Nevertheless, the construction industry involves electricity, cement, and steel with enormous carbon emissions. Therefore, Wuhan should take measures towards a low-carbon economy and energy conservation, comprehensively promote green buildings, and continuously advance green, low-carbon, and sustainable urban development. The disposable income of urban residents is far above that of rural households. By 2020, the per capita disposable income for urban residents reached RMB 50,362 and for rural households reached RMB 31,150. This might be due to the different consumption habits of urban and rural residents. High-income people generate more carbon emissions due to diversified consumption patterns and higher consumption levels (Huang et al. 2022). Consequently, the contribution of urban consumption to CF far exceeded that of rural consumption.
Regarding economic development, the proportion of added value of the secondary industry and total investment in fixed assets as contributors to CF changes separately ranked second and fourth. It can be considered that the application of indicators from economic development is essential for explaining the change in CF in Wuhan. According to Hong et al. (2011), economic development and expansion are the predominant drivers of energy consumption growth in megacities, especially in secondary industries. From 2001 to 2020, the added value of Wuhan’s secondary industry increased from 59.50 billion to 555.75 billion Chinese Yuan and formed an industrial energy system dominated by coal and oil. During this period, the total investment in fixed assets increased to 843.13 billion Chinese Yuan, an increase of nearly 16.6 times. Total investment in fixed assets has promoted rapid economic growth, but it overwhelmingly depended upon fossil energy with high carbon emissions. The result of Lin (2016) is similar to our finding. In addition, Wuhan should optimize its industrial structure, transform the field of fixed assets investment, and push the economy towards high-quality development.
Regarding city size, the urbanization rate was second among all driving factors. Beginning in 2001, the urbanization rate in Wuhan increased from 59.20% to 74.68% by 2020, which was above the national average (63.89%) by 2020. Enormous amounts of arable and forest lands have been transformed to construction land under rapid urbanization (Zhen et al. 2017). In house-building and municipal infrastructure construction, the massive use of steel bars, cement, and vehicles has caused a surge in CO2 emissions. However, many rural laborers entering cities have improved the consumption level and demand for energy, electricity, and transportation, which are major industries that generate large quantities of carbon dioxide. Hao et al. (2016) promoted the theory of “multiple planning integration” urban areas, through encouraging people to utilize public service facilities, which may reduce carbon emissions, thereby solving the contradiction between resource demand and environmental protection and, consequently, improving the living environment and quality of life. The resident population is another important factor contributing to Wuhan’s CF. From 2001 to 2020, the resident population in Wuhan increased by 52.96%. The continuous population growth contributed to a greater resource need, causing a growth in resource consumption and carbon emissions from daily life.
Technological improvements have inhibited CF growth. Advances in technology can upgrade production and improve technology, which influences productivity. However, advances in technology can propel the application of energy conservation techniques, which influences carbon intensity. In this study, CF growth was inhibited by Wuhan’s energy consumption per unit of GDP. This is similar to the observations of Su et al. (2018), who reported that progress in both production and energy conservation technologies has constrained CF growth. Consequently, Wuhan should place greater emphasis on investment and innovation in technology, strengthen policy support efforts for technology research and application, and achieve sustainable development goals.
Conclusions and policy recommendations
Urban CF and economic development interact. To move toward sustainable economic and social development, it is crucial to understand the nexus between CF and economic development. From 2001 to 2020, Wuhan was in a carbon surplus state and under enormous pressure to reduce carbon emissions due to its CF being much larger than its CC. Among these accounts, the energy consumption account dominates Wuhan’s CF, and the energy consumption structure is mainly comprised of raw coal, coke, and crude oil. Furthermore, we found that Wuhan was mainly in the ecological stress relief zone and mild enhancement zone during 2001–2020. We further analyzed the decoupling relationships between CF and economic development. This confirmed that a transition stage exists in Wuhan between weak decoupling and strong decoupling. Our research identifies the important factors influencing Wuhan’s CF. Notably, the urban per capita residential building area is crucial in promoting Wuhan’s CF, while technological progress inhibits CF’s growth. Such findings provide valuable policy insights for low-carbon urban development and for continuous improvement of a city’s sustainability.
First, Wuhan should rationally adjust its economic structure through gradual cessation of high energy consumption and high emission projects, actively developing knowledge and technology-intensive industries. As one of the three intelligence-intensive areas and comprehensive transportation hubs in China, Wuhan could fully exploit the advantages of high-tech and logistics industries. Moreover, the city can also support the development of the digital economy, culture, and tourism.
Second, Wuhan should optimize its energy structure by shifting from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy sources. This study showed that Wuhan has gradually diminished its consumption of various fossil fuels in recent years. Solar, wind, tidal, and geothermal energy should be energetically popularized and applied. Wuhan will further develop geothermal energy in the 14th Five-Year Plan period because of its abundant resources, cleanliness, and stability. Preferable policies should be implemented to support citizens’ use of renewable energy.
Finally, capacity-building efforts must be strengthened to enhance public awareness. Improving public awareness is critical for cities to achieve sustainable development. Positive and beneficial capacity-building efforts involve TV, radio, internet, magazines, and billboards. The city government should provide an additional financial budget to support these activities.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Gross domestic product
Partial least squares
Carbon carrying capacity
Variable important in projection
Average low calorific value
Carbon content per unit calorific value
Carbon oxidation rate
Annual average mileage
First-order attenuation method
Degradable organic carbon
- R T :
Amount of CH4 and CO2 recovered
Degradable organic matter
Methane correction factor
Carbon deficit pressure index
Bai ZH, Ma WQ, Ma L, Velthof GL, Wei ZB, Havlik P, Oenema O, Lee MRF, Zhang FS (2018) China’s livestock transition: driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Sci Adv 4:eaar8534. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8534
Bayer A, Bachmann M, Müller A, Kaufmann H (2012) A comparison of feature-based MLR and PLS regression techniques for the prediction of three soil constituents in a degraded South African ecosystem. App Environ Soil Sci 2012:971252. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/971252
Cai H, Qu SJ, Wang M (2020) Changes in China’s carbon footprint and driving factors based on newly constructed time series input-output tables from 2009 to 2016. Sci Total Environ 711:134555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134555
Cao YQ, Zhu MM, Zheng S (2017) Spatiotemporal changes of carbon footprint and carbon bearing capacity in Hebei province. Chin J Agric Resour Region Plan 38(8):55–63. https://doi.org/10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20170808
Chen FY, Chen H, Wu MF, Li SS, Long RY (2019) Research on the driving mechanism of waste separation behavior: based on qualitative analysis of chinese urban residents. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 16:1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101859
Chong CH, Ma LW, Li Z, Ni WD, Song SZ (2015) Logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) decomposition of coal consumption in China based on the energy allocation diagram of coal flows. Energy 85:366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.100
East AJ (2008) Vegetable industry carbon footprint scoping study discussion paper 1: what is a carbon footprint? An overview of definitions and methodologies. Horticulture Australia Limited, Sydney
Fang CL, Li GD, Wang SJ (2016) Changing and differentiated urban landscape in China: spatiotemporal patterns and driving Forces. Environ Sci Technol 50(5):2217–2227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05198
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2006) Livestock’s long shad. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM.
Fu W, Luo MC, Chen JC, Udimal TB (2020) Carbon footprint and carbon carrying capacity of vegetation in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of Yunnan. Phys Chem Earth 120:102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102904
Grand MC (2016) Carbon emission targets and decoupling indicators. Ecol Indic 67:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.042
Hao WW, Zhang MQ, Liu ZQ (2016) Empirical study on the relationship between traffic, urban compactness and urban productivity-based on the panel data analysis of prefecture-level cities in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. Macroeconomics 1:109–120. https://doi.org/10.16304/j.cnki.11-3952/f.2016.01.011
He KB, Huo H, Zhang Q, He DQ, An F, Wang M, Walsh MW (2005) Oil consumption and CO2 emissions in China’s road transport: current status, future trends, and policy implications. Energy Policy 33(12):1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.007
Hong LX, Liang JS, Cai JM, Zhuang L (2011) Growths of industrial energy consumption in China’s prefecture-level cities: based on the data in 2001–2006. Geogr Res 30(1):83–93
Huang ZQ (2019) Partial least squares regression analysis to factor of influence for ecological footprint. Cluster Comput 22:6425–6433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2180-5
Huang YZ, Shigetomi Y, Chapman A, Matsumoto K (2019) Uncovering household carbon footprints drivers in an aging, shrinking society. Energies 12:3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193745
Huang Y, Yu Q, Wang RR (2021) Driving factors and decoupling effect of carbon footprint pressure in China: based on net primary production. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 167:120722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120722
Huang HT, Dong XW, Zhi RZ (2022) Urban resident’s low carbon consumption behaviors and the influencing factors under the dual carbon background in Zhejiang province. J Arid Land Resour Environ 36(11):27–33. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2022.272
Jia JS, Deng HB, Duan J, Zhao JZ (2009) Analysis of the major drivers of the ecological footprint using the STIRPAT model and the PLS method—a case study in Henan Province, China. Ecol Econ 68:2818–2824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.012
Kajaste R, Hurme M (2016) Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions-management options and abatement cost. J Clean Prod 112:4041–4052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055
Li Z, Li GP, Hu Z (2017) Low carbon development status and target strategy in western megalopolis: a case of Xi’an City. Arid Land Geogr 40(2):434–440. https://doi.org/10.13826/j.cnki.cn65-1103/x.2017.02.023
Li L, Shan YL, Lei YL, Wu SM, Yu X, Lin XY, Chen YP (2019) Decoupling of economic growth and emissions in China’s cities: a case study of the Central Plains urban agglomeration. Appl Energy 244:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.192
Li RR, Wang Q, Liu Y, Yang X (2022a) How can Germany reduce production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions? A decomposition analysis. Carbon Manag 12(4):335–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1937322
Li XM, Wang Y, Song Y (2022b) Unraveling land system vulnerability to rapid urbanization: an indicator-based vulnerability assessment for Wuhan. China. Environ Res 211:112981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112981
Lin MS (2016) CO2 emission reduction under China’s urbanization process: The economic cost and the strategies of emission reduction. J Quant Tech Econ 33(3):59–77. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2016.03.005
Lombardi E, Laiola E, Tricase C, Rana R (2017) Assessing the urban carbon footprint: an overview. Environ Impact Assess Rev 66:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.005
Long Y, Yoshida Y, Fang K, Zhang HR, Dhondt M (2019) City-level household carbon footprint from purchaser point of view by a modified input-output model. Appl Energy 236:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.002
Lu JY, Huang XJ, Chen Y, Xiao X (2013) Spatiotemporal changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China. Geogr Res 32(2):326–336
Lu YSY, Geng Y, Qian YY, Han WY, McDowall W, Bleischwitz R (2016) Changes of human time and land use pattern in one mega city’s urban metabolism: a multi-scale integrated analysis of Shanghai. J Clean Prod 133:391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.174
Mancini MS, Galli A, Niccolucci V, Lin D, Bastianoni S, Wackernagel M, Marchettini N (2016) Ecological Footprint: refining the carbon Footprint calculation. Ecol Indic 61:390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040
Mi ZF, Zheng HL, Meng J, Ou JM, Hubacek K, Coffman D, Stern N, Liang S, Wei YM (2020) Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China. Nat Sustain 3:529–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0504-y
Monecke A, Leisch F (2012) semPLS: Structural equation modeling using partial least squares. J Stat Softw 48(3):1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i03
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2020) China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook 2020. China Statistics Press, Beijing
Pan JH, Zhang YN (2021) Spatiotemporal patterns of energy carbon footprint and decoupling effect in China. Acta Geogr Sin 76(1):206–222. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb202101016
Qu SN, Yang DH (2011) A study on China’s GHG emission from waste sector: trend and peak value. Chin Ind Econ 11:37–47. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2011.11.004
Shen L, Zhao JA, Wang LM, Liu LT, Wang Y, Yao YL, Geng YB, Gao TM, Cao Z (2016) Calculation and evaluation on carbon emission factor of cement production in China. Chin Sci Bull 61:2926–2938. https://doi.org/10.1360/N972016-00037
Su B, Ang BW, Li Y (2017) Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore’s carbon emissions. Energy Policy 105:484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.027
Su WS, Liu YY, Wang SJ, Zhao YB, Su YX, Li SJ (2018) Regional inequality, spatial spillover effects, and the factors influencing city-level energy-related carbon emissions in China. J Geogr Sci 28(4):495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1486-9
Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
Tian PP, Li D, Lu HW, Feng SS, Nie QW (2021) Trends, distribution, and impact factors of carbon footprints of main grains production in China. J Clean Prod 278:123347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123347
Wang C, Engels A, Wang ZH (2018) Overview of research on China’s transition to low-carbon development: The role of cities, technologies, industries and the energy system. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1350–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.099
Wold S, Albano C, Dunn WJ (1983) Pattern regression finding and using regularities in multivariate data. Analysis Applied Science Publication, London
Wuhan Statistics Bureau (2021) Statistical communique of national economic and social development of Wuhan in 2021. http://tjj.wuhan.gov.cn/tjfw/tjnj/202112/t20211220_1877108.
Yan F, Wang Y, Du Z, Chen Y, Chen YH (2018) Quantification of ecological compensation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei based on carbon footprint calculated using emission factor method proposed by IPCC. Transactions of the CSAE 34(4):15–20. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.04.002.
Yang Y, Meng GF (2019) The decoupling effect and driving factors of carbon footprint in megacities: the case study of Xi’an in western China. Sustain Cities Soc 44:783–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.012
Yang YY, Zhao T, Wang YN, Shi ZH (2015) Research on impacts of population-related factors on carbon emissions in Beijing from 1984 to 2012. Environ Impact Assess Rev 55:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.06.007
Zhang C, Yi JT, Chen H, Zhao XL, He Q, Chai HX (2014) Estimation of carbon emission from urban wastewater treatment in Chongqing. J Southwest Univ 36(9):135–139. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2014.09.022
Zhang D, Shen JB, Zhang FS, Li YE, Zhang WF (2017) Carbon footprint of grain production in China. Sci Rep 7(1):4126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04182-x
Zhao XG, Xiao L, Ma CH, Hao GJ, Yang F (2014) Dynamic analysis of carbon footprint and evaluation of carbon emission degree in Shanxi province. J Arid Land Resour Environ 28(9):21–26. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2014.09.020
Zhen W, Qin QD, Kuang YQ, Huang NS (2017) Investigating low-carbon crop production in Guangdong Province, China (1993–2013): a decoupling and decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 146:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.022
We thank TopEdit LLC for the linguistic editing and proofreading during the preparation of this manuscript. We appreciate the constructive comments provided by anonymous reviewers to this paper.
Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2022JJ40193).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional file 1: Table S1.
Decoupling state and explanation of the carbon footprint and economic growth. Table S2. Carbon emission coefficients for various types of fuels. Table S3. Animal intestinal fermentation CH4 emission factor. Table S4. Manure management CH4 emission factor. Fig. S1. Changes in CF, CC, and CD in Wuhan from 2001 to 2020. Fig. S2. VIP plot.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, G., Li, X., Pan, D. et al. Decoupling effect and driving factors of carbon footprint in megacity Wuhan, Central China. Ecol Process 12, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-023-00435-y
- Carbon footprint
- Economic development
- Decoupling analysis
- Partial least squares analysis