Skip to main content

Cascading effect of source limitation on the granivore-mediated seed dispersal of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) in secondary forest ecosystems

Abstract

Background

Granivore-mediated seed dispersal is susceptible to changes in seed availability and silvicultural management, which alters synzoochorous interactions in the antagonism-mutualism continuum and affects the seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE), and eventually, the plant recruitment. We conducted a whole-year study of seed addition to quantify the granivores-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) synzoochorous interactions and the SDE in the same secondary forests with two treatments. Both treatments had seed source limitations: one was caused by the disappearance of Korean pine due to the historical disturbance, the other by pinecone harvesting in Korean pine plantations adjacent to the secondary forests. Thinning with different intensities (control, 25%, and 50%) were also performed to further explore the synzoochorous interactions and SDE in response to silvicultural management in the second type of forests.

Results

Source limitation increased the proportion of pre- and post-dispersal seed predation, and made the granivores-Korean pine interaction shift more towards antagonism, with the estimated SDE of 2.31 and 3.60, respectively, for the secondary forests without and with Korean pine. Thinning with different intensities did not alleviate the reactions towards antagonism but altered SDE; granivores occurrence decreased, but the proportion of pre- and post-dispersal seed predation increased, resulting in a fivefold decreased seedling recruitment in 25% thinning (the lowest SDE of 0.26).

Conclusion

The source limitation coupling thinning biased the synzoochorous interactions more towards antagonism and significantly lowered granivore-mediated SDE, which limited the successful recruitment of Korean pine in secondary forests. Forest managers should control pinecone harvesting, protect the synzoochorous interaction, and take into account masting event for Korean pine regeneration in the future.

Introduction

In many forest ecosystems, granivore-mediated seed dispersal is essential to the natural regeneration of their dominant nut-bearing species, and ultimately influences plant community composition and structure (Boone and Mortelliti 2019; Gomez et al. 2019). These granivorous animals often play a dual role, simultaneously as an effective seed disperser and as a seed predator, which is defined as synzoochory (Zong et al. 2010; Bogdziewicz et al. 2020). As seed dispersers, they regularly drop and hoard seeds during transport, and fail to recover or incompletely consume all the cached seeds, resulting in seed germination in the cached site (Vander Wall and Longland 2004; Pesendorfer et al. 2016). As seed predators, they frequently consume a proportion of either pre-dispersed seeds (Nuñez et al. 2008; Zong et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2015) or post-dispersed seeds (Heggenstaller et al. 2006; Maron et al. 2012). Therefore, synzoochorous interactions are not exclusively antagonistic or mutualistic (Gomez et al. 2019; Bogdziewicz et al. 2020). Natural or human-induced changes often alter the availability of suitable seeds (Ruano et al. 2015; Peters and Visscher 2019), result in habitat loss or fragmentation for granivores (Chen et al. 2019; Zeng et al. 2019), and further influence the synzoochorous interactions. Together, synzoochorous interactions and environmental conditions determine the seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE), and eventually, affect the plant recruitment in the landscape (Schupp et al. 2010; Charco et al. 2017; Sawaya et al. 2018; Jácome-Flores 2019).

For those species depending on synzoochorous interactions, seed availability limitation may trigger a series of cascading effects. Previous studies reported that poor seed dispersal could be caused by excessive pre-dispersal seed predation or insufficient abundance of granivores (McKinney and Fiedler 2010; Xu et al. 2015; Čepelka et al. 2020). Furthermore, fewer deposited seeds escape consumption and survive in the winter safely (particularly for dormant seeds) due to high proportion of post-dispersal seed predation (Maron et al. 2012; Morán-López et al. 2016; Zwolak et al. 2016; Turley et al. 2017). Consequently, lower proportion of seedlings survives due to a high proportion of rodent excision in the stage of seed germination, which has been reported in many species such as oaks (Quercus variabilisQ. rubra, Q. palustris) and black spruce (Côté et al. 2003; Shi et al. 2018; Yi et al. 2019). Although these phenomena are clearly described in the literature (Acácio et al. 2007; Piao et al. 2011), few researches integrate the cascading effects triggered by seed limitation for the whole phase of seed-to-seedling transition of dominant tree species.

Seed harvesting is one of the human-induced disturbances on seed availability (Piao et al. 2011; de Oliveira Wadt et al. 2018). Humans, motivated by economic interests, directly compete with animals for edible seeds. For example, humans harvest over 85% of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) seeds in Changbai Mountains (Piao et al. 2011), and Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa) harvest can bring an income of US $166 million/year in Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru (de Oliveira Wadt et al. 2018). However, there is a divergent effect of source limitation on synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness. For instance, there is poor recruitment of Korean pine after seed harvesting (Liu et al. 2004; Piao et al. 2011), but almost 8% of remaining Brazil nut seeds after harvest are enough for its recruitment in South America (de Oliveira Wadt et al. 2018). Therefore, it is necessary to explore how the source limitation affects synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated SDE.

A series of silvicultural treatments (e.g., thinning, forming forest gaps) has been proved to affect granivore-mediated seed regeneration (Ruano et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2019). Compared with control, thinning treatment can provide a niche with sufficient light environment for understory, alter food and shelter for granivorous animals, either increasing the risk of post-dispersal seed predation (Caccia et al. 2009; Dracup et al. 2015; Yu et al. 2017) or increasing the quantity and survival of cached seeds (Wang et al. 2019), subsequently affect the regeneration of dominant tree species (Tardós et al. 2019). However, there is little information available regarding that how the thinning treatment affects synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated SDE under the circumstance of seed limitation.

Mixed broadleaved and Korean pine forests are the primary forests in Northeast China and the Far East region of Russia (Miyaki 1987; Zhang et al. 2013). However, after decades of destructive timber exploitation and a large fire in the early 1950s, the primary forests were degraded into secondary forests with the lack of Korean pine, and secondary forests have become the major forest resource (accounting for more than 70%) in Northeast China (Zhu et al. 2007; Yan et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2013). Although a small area of Korean pine plantation (3.1 × 105 ha) has been established within the forest landscape dominated by secondary forests (National Forestry and Grassland Administration 2019), the poor recruitment of Korean pine persists in secondary forests, which threatens the restoration of mixed broadleaved and Korean pine forests (Zhang et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2016; Song et al. 2018). Korean pine can naturally recruit depending on only seed regeneration (including seed dispersal, soil seed bank, seedling establishment, etc.). Furthermore, once ripened and fallen from a tree, the nutrient- and energy-rich seeds of Korean pine within the cone must need the help of seed-dispersing granivores such as Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) and spotted nutcracker (Nucifraga caryocatactes) (Lu 2003). After seed dispersal of Korean pine, it is only possible to realize its seed regeneration. However, the mechanisms of natural regeneration obstacle of Korean pine in secondary forests are still unclear.

This study aims to elucidate the regeneration obstacle mechanism of Korean pine and promote its seed regeneration in secondary forests. We focused on two questions: (1) how does the source limitation of Korean pine affect the granivore-mediated seed dispersal, especially for synzoochorous interactions and SDE? (2) Is it feasible to change the above synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated SDE with thinning treatment in secondary forests? Consequently, the same secondary forests with two treatments were selected in the present study, i.e., the secondary forests without Korean pine (historical disturbance caused the disappearance of Korean pine), and the same secondary forests with thinning treatment and Korean pine plantations distributed nearby with pine seeds being harvested. We hypothesized:

H1

The limitation of seed availability decreases the frequency of granivores activities, increases both pre- and post-dispersal seed predation, and decreases seed germination in the next spring, especially in the secondary forests where historical disturbances eliminated Korean pine.

H2

Thinning treatment changes the microhabitat conditions for granivores activity and promotes seed survival, weakens the above reactions to seed limitation, and is conducive for seed germination.

H3

Seed limitation causes a negative deviation for synzoochorous interactions and reduces the SDE, while thinning treatment improves SDE.

Methods

Study area and Korean pine

The study site is located in the temperate secondary forests in Qingyuan Forest CERN, Northeast China, which is located in Changbai Mountain (41°55′27′′ N, 124°58′52′′ E, and 500–1100 m above sea level). The climate is a continental type with monsoon and windy spring, a warm and humid summer, and dry and cold winter. The annual average precipitation in the area is 810.9 mm, and the mean annual air temperature is 4.7 °C, with a monthly mean maximum of 22.11 °C in August and a monthly mean minimum of − 12.38 °C in January. The frost-free period lasts 130 days, and the growing season ranges from early April to late September (Zhu et al. 2007). The soil type is characterized as brown forest soil (brown forest soil containing 25.6% sand, 51.2% silt, and 23.2% clay) that is 60–80 cm thick (Yang et al. 2010; Lu et al. 2018). The secondary forests in Qingyuan Forest CERN are currently dominated by broadleaved tree species such as Fraxinus mandshurica, F. rhynchophylla, Phellodendron amurense, Acer mono, and Quercus mongolica. Only a small part of the secondary forests are surrounded by Korean pine plantations, leaving most of the secondary forests without the supply of Korean pine seeds in our study area (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Spatial distribution of the same secondary forests with two treatments (B, D) in the study area (A), and schematic diagram for the location of seed stations in stands (C, E). U-SF: secondary forests without Korea pine plantations

The cone of Korean pine (P. koraiensis) is large, with 10–17 cm in length and 252 ± 60.4 g in weight; each cone contains 70–184 viable seeds (Hayashida 1989). The flowering period is in June, and cone maturity is in September of the next year. Granivore-mediated Korean pine seed dispersal typically occurs in September. P. koraiensis is characterized by an obvious masting pattern, with an average mast interval of 3–5 years.

Study design

In total, 12 plots were chosen in the secondary forests without Korean pine plantations, and nine plots were selected in the secondary forests nearby Korean pine plantations (Fig. 1). Uniform thinning (control, 25%, and 50%; three plots for each treatment) was conducted in the secondary forests nearby Korean pine plantations in 2017. All of these plots were similar in topography (18–28° in slope, 158–228° in aspect, and mid-slope position), species composition, and tree size (the diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 20 to 35 cm). The tree densities in the control, 25% thinning, and 50% thinning stand were 608, 473, and 305 stems ha−1, respectively. We set up one seed station per plot in the secondary forests without Korean pine plantations (total 12 stations), and three stations per plot in the secondary forests adjacent to the Korean pine plantations (each station was set at a 12-m interval per plot, total 27 stations) (Fig. 1).

Quantifying granivores abundance

The infrared digital cameras (Ereagel Trail Cameras E1 series, Shenzhen, China) were locked to the ground and faced north or south in each seed station from the year 2018 to 2019. We set the camera to take three photos after each trigger in each seed station (a total of 27 cameras), and the time interval between each trigger was 10s. All cameras were operated 24 h a day. We downloaded photos and checked batteries every 2-3 months; identified the animal types and the occurrence frequency by Image Information Management System (IIMS) (Murphy et al. 2017).

Seed releasing and tracking

Korean pine seeds were collected from cone-pickers and floated in water to exclude insect-damaged/empty seeds (Jansen et al. 2014). A 0.3-mm-diameter hole was created in each experimental seed through a drill, and a unique ID plastic tag (3 cm × 2 cm) with a 12-cm thin steel thread was individually attached in the hole of seed (Xiao et al. 2013; Xiao and Zhang 2016). We evenly placed 200 tagged seeds at each seed station for 12 times, from the early autumn (late August) of 2018 to the summer (July) of 2019 (total of 2400 seeds at each seed station). Following the seed predation, removal and cache by granivores, we recorded seed fates by searching the plastic tags with ID leaving outside. The seed fates recorded included: pre-dispersal seed predation (Pre-DSP), post-dispersal seed predation (Post-DSP), and scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation (SH-EP). The recording was made every day in the first 3 days of seed release, and then we tracked seed fates every other day in the later period until all of the seeds were removed or consumed from the seed station.

Seedling emergence, survival and growth in the field

When the tagged seeds were dispersed and cached by granivores, untagged healthy seeds were cached at similar depths nearby labeled seeds (the tagged seed cannot germinate with damaged embryo). These untagged seeds were monitored for seedling emergence, survival, and growth in June–September 2019. We investigated the amount of 1-year Korean pine seedlings every month in each seed cached site. We tagged each seedling found and recorded its coordinates. We also assessed the light environment (Canopy openness) of individual seedlings using hemispherical “fisheye” photography. Photographs were taken with Canon 6D and Canon 8–15 mm f/4L USM hemispherical lens. Images were processed by the Gap Light Analyzer Software (Sun et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2020). The relevant results are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Data analysis

The mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions were operationally defined as the proportion of scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation (positive effects) minus the proportion of both pre-dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation (negative effects) (Gomez et al. 2019). Seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE) was calculated as the number of seeds dispersed by dispersal agents multiplied by the probability that a viable dispersed seed will survive, germinate, and produce a new seedling (Schupp et al. 2010).

To test Hypothesis 1: the cascade effect of source limitation on granivore-mediated seed dispersal, we performed generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to identify the difference of granivores activities, the amount of pre-dispersal seed predation, post-dispersal seed predation, scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation and germinated seedlings (survival or excised by granviores) in secondary forests with or without Korean pine. We applied GLMMs with negative binomial error distributions for granivore occurrence data with non-normally distributed and overdispersal, and GLMMs with binomial error distributions followed by Wald’s χ2 test for other data. We took forest type (with and without Korean pine), season, and their interaction as fixed factors, and the provisioning station nested in the plot as a random effect to control for both repeated sampling and non-independence in the secondary forest.

To test Hypothesis 2: the effect of thinning treatment with different intensities, we replaced the “forest type (with and without Korean pine)” as “thinning treatment” in above fixed factor, and performed GLMMs again with others unchanged. All analyses were performed with the glmmTMB package in R software (Brooks et al. 2017).

To test Hypothesis 3: the effect of source limitation and thinning on synzoochorous interactions and SDE, an independent-samples T-test was used to examine the effect of source limitation on the outcome of mutualism–antagonism synzoochorous interactions and SDE (performed with MASS package in R language). One-way ANOVAs, followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests, were conducted to examine the effects of thinning treatment with different intensities on synzoochorous interactions and SDE (performed with multcomp package in R software).

Results

Effects of source limitation on granivore activities and seed fates

The significant difference in granivores occurrence was shown between the two treatments for secondary forests. The frequency of granivores occurrence was 60% higher in the secondary forests without Korean pine plantations, especially for S. vulgaris and N. caryocatactes (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S2). However, except for N. caryocatactes and T. sibiricus, granivores occurrence displayed no significant seasonal variation (Table 1; Fig. 2); a higher occurrence of T. sibiricus was shown in summer and autumn, N. caryocatactes, vice versa (Additional file 1: Table S1; Fig. 2).

Table 1 Effects of source limitation due to historical disturbance and human competing with pinecones, thinning treatments and season on granivores activities and Korean pine seed regeneration processes
Fig. 2
figure 2

Granivore occurrence in secondary forests. U-SF: secondary forests without Korea pine plantations; U: secondary forests adjacent to Korea pine plantations. 25%: 25% thinning treatment; 50%: 50% thinning treatment

Pre-dispersal seed predation was 57.0% and 67.0%, while post-dispersal seed predation was 19.3% and 11.5%, in the secondary forests without and with pine plantations, and the differences were significant (Table 1; Fig. 3). About 1.9% and 3.1% of seeds were escaped from predation and cached intact, in the secondary forests without and with pine plantations, respectively, but the difference was not significant (Additional file 1: Table S3, Fig. 4). Among those seeds cached intact, a few seeds escaped the predation and germinated, resulting in a 0.7% and 1.1% seed germination rate in the secondary forests without and with Korean pine plantations, respectively. Among those germinated, granivores excised 34.4% and 28.4% seedlings in the secondary forests without and with Korean pine plantations, respectively (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S3; Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The proportion of pre-dispersal seed predation, post-dispersal seed predation, and scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation in the secondary forests. U-SF: secondary forests without Korea pine plantations; U: secondary forests adjacent to Korea pine plantations. 25%: 25% thinning treatment; 50%: 50% thinning treatment

Fig. 4
figure 4

The proportion of total seedling recruitment (a), and the relative proportion of seedling survival (b) in the secondary forests. U-SF: secondary forests without Korea pine plantations; U: secondary forests adjacent to Korea pine plantations; 25%: 25% thinning treatment; 50%: 50% thinning treatment

The occurrence of granivores

After the whole year’s infrared camera monitoring, the main types of animals were S. vulgaris, N. caryocatactes, Tamias sibiricus, Apodemus peninsulae, Mesechinus hughi, Lepus mandshuricus, Mustela sibirica, Meles meles, and Accipiter gentilis (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Among these animals, S. vulgaris, N. caryocatactes, T. sibiricus, and A. peninsulae belong to granivores and regularly appeared in every plot, others occasionally appeared (Additional file 1: Table S1). The animal with the highest frequency was S. vulgaris, followed by Nucifraga caryocatactes and then by T. sibiricus, all of which are both seed dispersers and seed predators (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Fig. S2). A. peninsulae and M. hughi are pure seed predators, while Accipiter gentilis is the predator of S. vulgaris (Additional file 1: Fig. S2).

Effects of thinning treatment on granivores activities and seed fates

Thinning and season significantly affected the occurrence of granivores (Table 1). The rank of granivores occurrence was as follows: control > 50% thinning > 25% thinning, and summer > autumn > spring > winter (Fig. 2). Among animals, the frequency was S. vulgaris > A. peninsulae > N. caryocatactes > T. sibiricus (Fig. 2). There was a significant interaction between animal type and season (F = 40.54, df = 9, P < 0.001). Thinning significantly affected S. vulgaris, which occurred significantly less in 25% thinning stands than in control, but the season did not (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S4; Fig. 2). N. caryocatactes was not affected by thinning, but it was affected by season, i.e., summer > winter > spring > autumn (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S4; Fig. 2). T. sibiricus was affected by thinning, with control > 50% thinning > 25% thinning, and by season with summer > autumn » spring » winter (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S4; Fig. 2). A. peninsulae was not affected by thinning, but it was affected by season with summer > autumn > spring » winter (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S4; Fig. 2).

Although thinning and season did not significantly affect pre-dispersal seed predation, they did significantly affect post-dispersal seed predation (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S5). No significant interactions were found between seasonal and thinning treatment for either pre-dispersal seed predation or post-dispersal seed predation. The proportion of post-dispersal seed predation was highest in 50% thinning treatment (averaged 16.5%, 12.5%, and 11.5% in 50% thinning, 25% thinning, and control stand, respectively). The post-dispersal seed predation in different seasons changed as follows: summer > autumn > spring > winter. The thinning treatment did not significantly affect the scatter-hoarding seeds that escape predation (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S5; Fig. 3). Only 2.5–3% of seeds survived the winter regardless of treatment. However, there was a difference in the rate of scatter-hoarding seeds that escape predation in different seasons (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S5). The highest rate of scatter-hoarding seeds that escape predation was shown in the autumn; the lowest was found in winter (on average, autumn was 5.3%, spring was 3%, summer was 2%, winter was 1%) (Fig. 3).

Thinning treatment had significantly negative effects on Korean pine seedling recruitment and mortality (Table 1). The result showed that the proportion of total germinated 1-year seedlings in control (1.1%) was higher than those in thinned stands, five-fold higher than 25% thinning treatment, and 1.7-fold higher than 50% thinning treatment (Fig. 4a). Among these seedlings, seedling mortality was higher in 25% thinning treatment (77.8%) than in control (24.8%), and the rest of 72.7%, 22.2%, and 85.2% seedling survived well in control, 25% and 50% thinning treatment (Table 1; Fig. 4b).

Synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness

There was a significant difference in the mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions between the two treatments for secondary forests (F = 2.21, df = 1, P = 0.04), but not among thinning treatments (F = 0.03, df = 3, P = 0.97) (Fig. 5a). The average outcome of positive effect minus negative effect was − 0.76 in the secondary forests without pine plantations, which is more biased to negative than in the secondary forests adjacent to Korean pine plantations (− 0.69). There was no significant difference in SDE between the two treatments for secondary forests (F = 1.27, df = 1, P = 0.27) (Fig. 5b), but a significant difference was observed among thinning treatments (F = 5.66, df = 3, P = 0.003) (Fig. 5c); the average outcome of SDE was 3.60 in control, 0.26 in 25% thinning treatment, and 2.90 in 50% thinning treatment.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions (a), granivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness in the same secondary forests with two treatments (b), and thinning treatment (c). SF: secondary forests; MBKPFs: mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forests; SDE: seed dispersal effectiveness; U-SF: secondary forests without Korea pine plantations; U: secondary forests adjacent to Korea pine plantations. 25%: 25% thinning treatment; 50%: 50% thinning treatment. The squirrels represented the mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions of granivores

Discussion

Cascading effects of source limitation on granivores activities, seed germination, and seedling survival

Historical disturbances, particularly logging, caused a significant decline of Pinus koraiensis, which degraded mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forests into secondary forests (Zhu et al. 2007; Yang et al. 2010). Therefore, Korean pine plantations were established to offer the seeds for pine seedling recruitment in secondary forests. Our results indicated that although protecting the seed source was necessary, pinecone harvesting persisted severely limited pine seedling recruitment, which was in line with the research of Piao (2011). Our results showed that almost 60% of seeds were consumed in situ, and 15% of seeds were eaten after dispersal (Fig. 3), which is much higher than the 22% predation of Korean pine seeds by Eurasian squirrels previously reported by Miyaki (1987). Our results further supported that, when seed scarcity had limited seed dispersal, granivores would be more inclined to eat seeds in situ than to disperse and cache seeds (Brocardo et al. 2018; Jácome-Flores et al. 2019). As a result, seeds would suffer heavy pre- and post-predation, especially for small and nutrient-rich pine seeds (Nuñez et al. 2008; Piao et al. 2011; Yu et al. 2014; Ruano et al. 2015).

Anthropogenic disturbances profoundly affected the seed dispersal process (Jácome-Flores et al. 2019). Some mammals changed their spatial distribution or activity patterns to avoid humans (Yang et al. 2018). We found that due to the lack of human disturbance caused by pinecone harvesting, the frequency occurrence of granivores was higher, but the proportion of pre-dispersal seed predation was lower in secondary forests without the Korean pine plantations than the secondary forests nearby Korean pine. However, due to food scarcity, the higher post-dispersal seed predation occurred in secondary forests without Korean pine plantations. Consequently, only 0.7% and 1.1% of seeds germinated successfully in secondary forests with/without Korean pine plantations, respectively. Among those successfully germinated seedlings, 28.4–34.4% seedling mortality was observed after the first growing season due to excision by rodents, fungal infection, and other unknown causes. The common situation of seedling excised by granivores has occurred in oaks or black spruce seedling in the food-scarce spring (Côté et al. 2003; Yi et al. 2019). However, our research disagrees with the studies in South America, which suggested that harvesting pinecones did not result in seed exhaustion, and a small number of remaining seeds were enough for recruitment (de Oliveira Wadt et al. 2018). In our research, an average of less than 1.2% of seedling survival is difficult to maintain the regeneration and recruitment of Korean pine in the secondary forests.

Overall, our study supported Hypothesis 1 that the limitation of seed availability affects granivores’ activities and decreases the survival of seeds, especially for those secondary forests without the Korean pine. The deficiency of seed source produced a cascading effect that ultimately prevented the recruitment of Korean pine and thus the restoration of secondary forests, which was in agreement with findings from others (Nuñez et al. 2008; Piao et al. 2011; Yu et al. 2014; Ruano et al. 2015).

Thinning treatment negatively affected granivore-mediated seed dispersal

Our results did not support Hypothesis 2 that thinning treatment affects granivore-mediated seed dispersal and promotes seed survival. Thinning negatively affected the granivore-mediated seed dispersal in secondary forests where pinecones were harvested in the adjacent plantations. We found that the animal activity frequency was less in the thinned stands (Fig. 2). The higher canopy openness resulted from thinning treatments likely discouraged animal occurrence, which supports previous studies that open habitats resulted in a lower granivore occurrence due to higher predation risk (Yu et al. 2017). We also found that the animal activity frequency was higher in summer and autumn, but lower in winter and spring, except for N. caryocatactes. This seasonal variation may be attributed to the quality and density of the interspecific synchrony or asynchrony of seed rain, with animals actively foraging during seed season (Ostoja et al. 2013; Xiao and Zhang 2016; Yang et al. 2020). However, the effect of thinning treatment on animal activity did not change with seasonal variation.

Our results suggested that lower foraging frequency did not reduce seed predation. The higher proportion of pre-dispersal seed predation and post-dispersal seed predation may be caused by that the desire for food counteracted the danger associated with the higher canopy openness in thinning treatment (Garcia-Del-Rey et al. 2009; Perea et al. 2011; Ziffer-Berger et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2019). A previous study reported that forest cover had a weak effect on seed predation when fruits were scarcer (Herrera et al. 2011). Compared with fruitful autumn, the increasingly higher proportion of pre-dispersal seed predation and post-dispersal seed predation occurred in the winter and spring of food shortages (Fig. 3). Thus, perceived predation risk, seed abundance and availability, and safe foraging options are all potentially affecting animal foraging (Garcia-Del-Rey et al. 2009). Although there is no obvious difference in the proportion of scatter-hoarding seeds that escape predation in thinning treatment, the final germinated seedlings in thinning stands were significantly lower than that in control, further proved the negative effect of thinning treatment on the granivore-mediated Korean pine seed dispersal and recruitment.

To some extent, our results indirectly supported a previous study that abiotic factors such as increased light level (created by thinning) may be unnecessary for the early regeneration of Korean pine (Zhang et al. 2013). We found the germinated seedlings were abundant under the 9–13% full sunlight observed in the control stand (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), and most of the secondary forests in our study area had >7% full sunlight to sustain the survival of seedlings (Sun et al. 2016). However, because of historical disturbance and persistent pinecone harvesting, few secondary forests have Korean pine seeds sufficient enough to satiate seed predators, allowing the cached seeds to escape predation and successfully germinate. Therefore, pinecone harvesting has become a significant obstacle to the recruitment of Korean pine (Kajimoto 2002; Piao et al. 2011).

Source limitation and thinning treatment changed the synzoochorous interactions and granivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness

The mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions depends on both intrinsic (seed abundance, see Bogdziewicz et al. 2018; seed size, see Cao et al. 2016; seed chemistry, see Xiao et al. 2008, 2009) and extrinsic factors (competitors, see Gómez et al. 2019; the spatial structure of vegetation, see Aliyu et al. 2018; and landscape-scale disturbance, see Pesendorfer et al. 2016; Zeng et al. 2019). According to the results of Gómez (2019) and Miyaki (1987), the outcome of granivores–seed interactions fluctuates around zero in the context of abundant food. However, our results showed that due to seed source limitation resulting from pinecone harvesting, the average difference value indicated that the mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions was more biased towards antagonism (Fig. 5a). In the mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forests with less human interference, we previously placed 100 seeds at each seed station and found that although fewer seeds added in seed station, the difference between the proportion of seed deposition and seed predation was significantly higher than those in the secondary forest found in this study (Fig. 5a; Additional file 1: Fig. S3). All of the evidence suggests that the human disturbance caused the negative deviation for mutualism–antagonism of synzoochorous interactions. The result is consistent with the part of hypothesis 3 that seed limitation results in a negative shift for synzoochorous interactions and reduces the seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE). Therefore, our results suggest that human-mediated disturbances may shift the positive effects of synzoochorous interactions to where interactions outcomes are detrimental for dispersal and regeneration (Jácome-Flores et al. 2019). Although the interactions between granivores and Korean pine seeds had a profound variation in the secondary forests with/without Korean pine, it did not impinge on the final SDE (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, thinning treatment did not significantly alleviate negative deviation for synzoochorous interactions, but decreased the SDE, especially in 25% thinning treatment (Fig. 5c). The reasonable explanation is that the mutualism–antagonism continuum of synzoochorous interactions may determine the quantity of dispersal (e.g., visitation frequency of animals, the amount of dispersed seeds), but maybe other abiotic factors affected the quality of dispersal (e.g., the probability of seed germination for dispersed seeds, the probability of seedling survival) (Schupp et al. 2010). Therefore, thinning treatment negatively affected granivore-mediated Korean pine SDE.

Study limitation

In this study, we selected two secondary forests to compare the effects of seed limitation (no seeds and few seeds) on synzoochorous interactions and SDE, one without Korean pine and the other nearby Korean pine plantations but with pinecones picking. Actually, secondary forests adjacent to Korean pine plantations without cone-picking should be used as the control for our study. However, such forests could not be found in the study area due to widespread pinecone harvest driven by economic profit. Therefore, we used published studies (Miyaki 1987; Hayashida 1989; Piao et al. 2011) and cross-regional field data to explain the findings of this study. Furthermore, the lack of replication is an unavoidable shortage in the design of this experiment. Due to the strict natural forest protection law in China, we were only permitted to conduct two thinning treatments with only one site per intensity level in secondary forests. As a result, we exercise caution in extrapolating the study results beyond the research sites.

Our study monitored the fates of dispersed seeds only for one year. A previous study indicated that only a small proportion of Korean pine seeds can germinate in the first spring after dispersal and the majority germinate in the second growing season after dispersal (Song et al. 2018), which suggests that the field data of seed germination with one-year survey could underestimate seed dispersal effectiveness. However, only less than 5% of the seeds survived after the first winter attribute to the higher proportion of granivore-mediated seed predation (Fig. 3). During this long period of ~ 20 months after dispersal, most of the seeds could be consumed by seed-caching granivores or deteriorated due to fungal attacks (Li et al. 2012; Lu et al. 2003). It is reasonable to believe that the remaining dormant seeds are almost impossible to survive the second winter at the cached sites. Therefore, we were convinced that the cascading effect of seed limitation directly caused the lower SDE. Apart from that, our results may underrate the amount of seed fates and germinated seedlings due to limited time and labor during the field investigation, depending on that the maximum dispersal distance is more than 4 km for Nucifraga caryocatactes and 1.8 km for Sciurus vulgaris (Lu et al. 2003). Thus, wider search range should be performed in the future study.

Although the field experiment was conducted in the non-mast year of Korean pine, this did not amplify the effect of the lack of food scarcity because these granivores aren’t the forest specialist species and other alternative resources are also available to these predators, such as acorn (Quercus mongolica) and walnut (Juglans mandshurica) (Yang et al. 2016). However, given the SDE will be different between non-mast years and mast years (Li et al. 2017; Zwolak et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2021), our studies should be run over more years in the future to illustrate that granivore-mediated Korean pine regeneration is inadequate to ensure the restoration of secondary forests into mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forests. Besides that, interspecific synchrony or asynchrony of seed rain plays a key role in the formation of animal-mediated seed dispersal (Yang et al. 2020; Yu et al. 2020), and seed rain compositions may further affect the dispersal success of Korean pine. For example, the presence of native oaks limits the dispersal of invasive ones in temperate Europe (Bogdziewicz et al. 2020) or enhances the dispersal of red oaks (Lichti et al. 2014). Therefore, the presence of other seeds complicates the issue of the influence of background pine seeds availability on dispersal, which should also be studied in the future.

Management implication

Synzoochorous interactions between the granivores and the Korean pine seeds determined the granivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness. Understanding where the synzoochorous interactions are located in the mutualism–antagonism continuum became essential to assess Korean pine recruitment and regeneration under the background of the human disturbance. Seed limitation had a cascading effect, decreasing the granivores’ occurrence and seed dispersal, increasing pre-dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation and making the synzoochorous interactions shift more towards antagonism in the mutualism–antagonism continuum (predation effect becomes more dominant over dispersal effect). This cascading effect was more severe in the secondary forests, where historical disturbances eliminated Korean pine. Thinning did not enhance the granivore-mediated Korean pine seed dispersal effectiveness. It decreased granivores occurrence, but increased the proportion of pre-dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation, resulting in five-fold decreased in seedling recruitment under 25% thinning treatment. Lower granivore-mediated SDE led to poorer Korean pine recruitment in the secondary forest under the uncontrolled pinecone harvesting.

These results have implications for silvicultural practices that it is necessary to reduce the thinning treatment, control pinecone harvesting, and protect the synzoochorous interactions during the Korean pine seed regeneration in secondary forests. If not, artificial regeneration (e.g., direct seedings or planting seedlings) should be considered, which has been proved that planting seedlings is an effective way to implement the short-term successful recruitment of Korean pine in secondary forests (Wang et al. 2021). Further studies are still needed to be considered and performed in synchrony with a masting event in the future, benefiting from the satiation effect and the decreasing seedling grazed by herbivores.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the author for data requests.

Abbreviations

SDE:

Seed dispersal effectiveness

Pre-DSP:

Pre-dispersal seed predation

Post-DSP:

Post-dispersal seed predation

SH-EP:

Scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation

References

  1. Acácio V, Holmgren M, Jansen PA, Schrotter O (2007) Multiple recruitment limitation causes arrested succession in Mediterranean cork oak systems. Ecosystems 10:1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9089-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aliyu B, Thia JA, Moltchanova E, Forget PM, Chapman HM (2018) Forest disturbance and seasonal food availability influence a conditional seed dispersal mutualism. Biotropica 50:750–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogdziewicz M, Lichti NI, Zwolak R (2018) Consumer-mediated indirect interaction with a native plant lowers the fitness of an invasive competitor. J Ecol 107:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogdziewicz M, Crone EE, Zwolak R, Rees M (2020) Do benefits of seed dispersal and caching by scatter-hoarders outweigh the costs of predation? An example with oaks and yellow-necked mice. J Ecol 108:1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boone SR, Mortelliti A (2019) Small mammal tree seed selection in mixed forests of the Eastern United States. For Ecol Manag 449:117487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brocardo CR, Pedrosa F, Galetti M (2018) Forest fragmentation and selective logging affect the seed survival and recruitment of a relictual conifer. For Ecol Manag 408:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Machler M, Bolker BM (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9:378–400. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000240890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caccia FD, Chaneton EJ, Kitzberger T (2009) Direct and indirect effects of understorey bamboo shape tree regeneration niches in a mixed temperate forest. Oecologia 161:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1412-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao L, Wang ZY, Yan C, Chen J, Guo C, Zhang ZB (2016) Differential foraging preferences on seed size by rodents result in higher dispersal success of medium-sized seeds. Ecology 97:3070–3078. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Čepelka L, Šipoš J, Suchomel J, Heroldová M (2020) Can we detect response differences among dominant rodent species to climate and acorn crop in a Central European forest environment? Eur J For Res 139:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01267-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charco J, Venturas M, Gil L, Nanos N (2017) Effective seed dispersal and fecundity variation in a small and marginal population of Pinus pinaster Ait. growing in a harsh environment: implications for conservation of forest genetic resources. Forests 8:312. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8090312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Zhong J, Carson WP, Tang Z, Xie Z, Sun S, Zhou Y, Edwards D (2019) Proximity to roads disrupts rodents’ contributions to seed dispersal services and subsequent recruitment dynamics. J Ecol 107:2623–2634. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Côté M, Ferron J, Gagnon R (2003) Impact of seed and seedling predation by small rodents on early regeneration establishment of black spruce. Can J Forest Res 33:2362–2371. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Oliveira Wadt LH, Faustino CL, Staudhammer CL, Kainer KA, Evangelista JS (2018) Primary and secondary dispersal of Bertholletia excelsa: implications for sustainable harvests. For Ecol Manag 415:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dracup EC, Keppie DM, Forbes GJ (2015) Woodland mouse and vole response to increased structural diversity following midrotation commercial thinning in spruce plantations. Can J Forest Res 45:1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Del-Rey E, Gil L, Nanos N, López-de-Heredia U, Muñoz PG, Fernández-Palacios JM (2009) Habitat characteristics and seed crops used by Blue Chaffinches Fringilla teydeain winter: implications for conservation management. Bird Study 56:168–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650902792007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gόmez JM, Schupp EW, Jordano P (2019) Synzoochory: The ecological and evolutionary relevance of a dual interaction. Biol Rev 94:874–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayashida M (1989) Seed dispersal by red squirrels and subsequent establishment of Korean pine. For Ecol Manag 28:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heggenstaller AH, Menalled FD, Liebman M, Westerman PR (2006) Seasonal patterns in post-dispersal seed predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi in three cropping systems. J Appl Ecol 43:999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01198.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrera JM, Morales JM, García D (2011) Differential effects of fruit availability and habitat cover for frugivore-mediated seed dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. J Ecol 99:1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01861.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jácome-Flores ME, Jordano P, Delibes M, Fedriani JM (2019) Interaction motifs variability in a Mediterranean palm under environmental disturbances: the mutualism–antagonism continuum. Oikos 129:367–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.06688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jansen PA, Visser MD, Wright SJ, Rutten G, Muller-Landau HC (2014) Negative density dependence of seed dispersal and seedling recruitment in a neotropical palm. Ecol Lett 17:1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kajimoto T (2002) Factors affecting seedling recruitment and survivorship of the Japanese subalpine stone pine, Pinus pumila, after seed dispersal by nutcrackers. Ecol Res 17:481–491. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00505.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li YB, Mou P, Wang M, Ge J (2012) Evaluation of regeneration potential of Pinus koraiensis in mixed pine-hardwood forests in the Xiao Xing’an Mountains, China. J Forest Res 23:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0294-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li N, Bai B, Li H, An Q, Lu H (2017) Dispersal of remnant endangered trees in a fragmented and disturbed forest by frugivorous birds. J Plant Res 130:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0915-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lichti NI, Steele A, Zhang H, Swihart K (2014) Mast species composition alters seed fate in North American rodent-dispersed hardwoods. Ecology 95:1746–1758. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1657.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu ZG, Ji LZ, Hao ZQ, Zhu JJ, Kang HZ (2004) Effect of cone-picking on natural regeneration of Korean pine in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve. Chin J Appl Ecol 15:958–962 (In Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lu CH (2003) Review on the study of relationship between natural regeneration of Korean pine and animals. Chin J Ecol 22:49–53 (In Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lu DL, Wang GG, Yan QL, Gao T, Zhu JJ (2018) Effects of gap size and within-gap position on seedling growth and biomass allocation: Is the gap partitioning hypothesis applicable to the temperate secondary forest ecosystems in Northeast China? For Ecol Manag 429:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maron JL, Pearson DE, Potter T, Ortega YK, Rees M (2012) Seed size and provenance mediate the joint effects of disturbance and seed predation on community assembly. J Ecol 100:1492–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McKinney ST, Fiedler CE (2010) Tree squirrel habitat selection and predispersal seed predation in a declining subalpine conifer. Oecologia 162:697–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1496-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miyaki M (1987) Seed dispersal of the Korean pine, Pinus koraiensis, by the red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris. Ecol Res 2:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02346923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morán-López T, Wiegand T, Morales JM, Valladares F, Díaz M (2016) Predicting forest management effects on oak-rodent mutualisms. Oikos 125:1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy AJ, Farris ZJ, Karpanty S, Kelly MJ, Miles KA, Ratelolahy F, Rahariniaina RP, Golden CD (2017) Using camera traps to examine distribution and occupancy trends of ground-dwelling rainforest birds in north-eastern Madagascar. Bird Conserv Internat 28:567–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270917000107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. National Forestry and Grassland Administration (2019) China Forest Resources Report—the Ninth National Forest Resources Inventory. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nuñez MA, Simberloff D, Relva MA (2008) Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasions. Biol Invasions 10:1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9214-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ostoja SM, Schupp EW, Durham S, Klinger R, McArthur C (2013) Seed harvesting is influenced by associational effects in mixed seed neighbourhoods, not just by seed density. Funct Ecol 27:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Perea R, Miguel AS, Gil L (2011) Acorn dispersal by rodents: the importance of re-dispersal and distance to shelter. Basic Appl Ecol 12:432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2011.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pesendorfer MB, Sillett TS, Koenig WD, Morrison SA (2016) Scatter-hoarding corvids as seed dispersers for oaks and pines: a review of a widely distributed mutualism and its utility to habitat restoration. The Condor 118:215–237. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-15-125.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peters VS, Visscher DR (2019) Seed availability does not ensure regeneration in northern ecosystems of the endangered Limber pine. Forests 10:146. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Piao ZJ, Tang L, Swihart RK, Wang S (2011) Human–wildlife competition for Korean pine seeds: vertebrate responses and implications for mixed forests on Changbai Mountain, China. Ann For Sci 68:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0097-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruano I, Manso R, Fortin M, Bravo F (2015) Extreme climate conditions limit seed availability to successfully attain natural regeneration of Pinus pinaster in sandy areas of central Spain. Can J Forest Res 45:1795–1802. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sawaya GM, Goldberg AS, Steele MA, Dalgleish HJ (2018) Environmental variation shifts the relationship between trees and scatter hoarders along the continuum from mutualism to antagonism. Integr Zool 13:319–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schupp EW, Jordano P, Gomez JM (2010) Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review. New Phytol 188:333–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03402.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shi W, Villar-Salvador P, Jacobs DF, Li G, Jiang X (2018) Simulated predation of Quercus variabilis acorns impairs nutrient remobilization and seedling performance irrespective of soil fertility. Plant Soil 423:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3518-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Song Y, Zhu JJ, Yan QL, Wang GC (2018) Korean pine seed: linking changes in dormancy to germination in the 2 years following dispersal. Forestry 91:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sun YR, Zhu JJ, Sun OJ, Yan QL (2016) Photosynthetic and growth responses of Pinus koraiensis seedlings to canopy openness: implications for the restoration of mixed-broadleaved Korean pine forests. Environ Exp Bot 129:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tardós P, Lucas-Borja ME, Beltrán M, Onkelinx T, Piqué M (2019) Composite low thinning and slash burning treatment enhances initial Spanish black pine seedling recruitment. For Ecol Manag 433:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Turley NE, Orrock JL, Ledvina JA, Brudvig LA, James J (2017) Dispersal and establishment limitation slows plant community recovery in post-agricultural longleaf pine savannas. J Appl Ecol 54:1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2004) Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends Ecol Evol 19:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang J, Yan QL, Lu DL, Diao MM, Yan T, Sun YR, Yu LZ, Zhu JJ (2019) Effects of microhabitat on rodent-mediated seed dispersal in monocultures with thinning treatment. Agric For Meteorol 275:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang J, Wang GG, Zhang T, Yuan JF, Yu LZ, Zhu JJ, Yan QL (2021) Use of direct seeding and seedling planting to restore Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. Et Zucc.) in secondary forests of Northeast China. For Ecol Manag 493:119243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2016) Contrasting patterns of short-term indirect seed–seed interactions mediated by scatter-hoarding rodents. J Anim Ecol 85:1370–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xiao ZS, Chang G, Zhang ZB (2008) Testing the high-tannin hypothesis with scatter-hoarding rodents: experimental and field evidence. Anim Behav 75:1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xiao ZS, Gao X, Jiang MM, Zhang ZB (2009) Behavioral adaptation of Pallas’s squirrels to germination schedule and tannins in acorns. Behav Ecol 20:1050–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Krebs C, Whitney K (2013) Long-term seed survival and dispersal dynamics in a rodent-dispersed tree: testing the predator satiation hypothesis and the predator dispersal hypothesis. J Ecol 101:1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Xie J, Yan QL, Yuan J, Li R, Lü X, Liu S, Zhu JJ (2020) Temporal effects of thinning on the leaf C:N:P stoichiometry of regenerated broadleaved trees in larch plantations. Forests 11:54. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu Y, Shen Z, Li D, Guo Q (2015) Pre-dispersal seed predation in a species-rich forest community: patterns and the interplay with determinants. PLoS ONE 10:e0143040. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan QL, Zhu JJ, Gang Q (2013) Comparison of spatial patterns of soil seed banks between larch plantations and adjacent secondary forests in Northeast China: implication for spatial distribution of larch plantations. Trees 27:1747–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0920-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang Y, Zhang M, Yi X (2016) Small rodents trading off forest gaps for scatter hoarding differs between seed species. For Ecol Manag 379:226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang K, Zhu JJ, Zhang M, Yan QL, Sun OJ (2010) Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in forest ecosystems of Northeast China: a comparison between natural secondary forest and larch plantation. J Plant Ecol 3:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtq022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang H, Zhao X, Han B, Wang T, Mou P, Ge J, Feng L (2018) Spatiotemporal patterns of Amur leopards in northeast China: influence of tigers, prey, and humans. Mamm Biol 92:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang X, Yan C, Gu H, Zhang Z (2020) Interspecific synchrony of seed rain shapes rodent-mediated indirect seed–seed interactions of sympatric tree species in a subtropical forest. Ecol Lett 23:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yi XF, Bartlow AW, Curtis R, Agosta SJ, Steele MA, Heard M (2019) Responses of seedling growth and survival to post-germination cotyledon removal: an investigation among seven oak species. J Ecol 107:1817–1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu F, Wang DX, Yi XF, Shi X, Huang Y, Zhang H, Zhang X (2014) Does animal-mediated seed dispersal facilitate the formation of Pinus armandii–Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forests? PLoS ONE 9:e89886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Yu F, Shi X, Zhang X, Yi XF, Wang DX, Ma J (2017) Effects of selective logging on rodent-mediated seed dispersal. For Ecol Manag 406:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Yu F, Wei S, Wang Y, Li Y, Ma J, Zhang L, Yi XF (2020) Asymmetric effects of rodent-mediated seed dispersal on co-existence of tree species via seed–seed interactions. For Ecol Manag 475:118396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeng D, Swihart RK, Zhao Y, Si X, Ding P, Rees M (2019) Cascading effects of forested area and isolation on seed dispersal effectiveness of rodents on subtropical islands. J Ecol 107:1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang M, Zhu JJ, Li MC, Zhang GQ, Yan QL (2013) Different light acclimation strategies of two coexisting tree species seedlings in a temperate secondary forest along five natural light levels. For Ecol Manag 306:234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang HM, Yan C, Wu SQ, Si JJ, Yi XF, Li HJ, Zhang ZB (2021) Effects of masting on seedling establishment of a rodent-dispersed tree species in a warm-temperate region, northern China. Integr Zool 16:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhu JJ, Mao ZH, Hu LL, Zhang JX (2007) Plant diversity of secondary forests in response to anthropogenic disturbance levels in montane regions of northeastern China. J Forest Res 12:403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-007-0033-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ziffer-Berger J, Weisberg PJ, Cablk ME, Moshe Y, Osem Y (2017) Shrubs facilitate pine colonization by controlling seed predation in dry Mediterranean dwarf shrublands. J Arid Environ 147:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zong C, Wauters LA, Van Dongen S, Mari V, Romeo C, Martinoli A, Preatoni D, Tosi G (2010) Annual variation in predation and dispersal of Arolla pine (Pinus cembra L.) seeds by Eurasian red squirrels and other seed-eaters. For Ecol Manag 260:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zwolak R, Bogdziewicz M, Wróbel A, Crone EE (2016) Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis. Oecologia 180:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3511-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the China Scholarship Council. Many thanks to Junfeng Yuan, Ting Zhang, Jin Xie, for assisting in data collection.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1808201, 31830016), K. C. Wong Education Foundation (GJTD-2018-07), and Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1807102).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JW, GGW, QLY and JJZ: conceived the ideas and designed the study. JW, RL, LZY and YRS: provided experiment equipment and collected field data. JW: analyzed the data and led the writing of the first draft of the manuscript. GGW, QLY and JJZ: substantially contributed to revising the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. Geoff Wang, Jiaojun Zhu or Qiaoling Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

The canopy openness distribution of regenerated Korean pine seedlings. Fig. S2 The main animals types shot by infrared camera. A: Sciurus vulgaris, B: Nucifraga caryocatactes, C: Tamias sibiricus, D: Apodemus peninsulae, E: Mesechinus hughi, F: Lepus mandshuricus, G: Mustela sibirica, H: Meles meles, I: Accipiter gentilis preying on Sciurus vulgaris. Fig. S3 The proportion of Pre-DSP, Post-DSP and SH-EP in Changbai Mountain primary forests. Pre-DSP: Pre-dispersal seed predation, Post-DSP: Post-dispersal seed predation, SH-EP: Scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation. Table S1. The cumulative numbers of each type of animals recorded by infrared cameras during four seasons in different secondary forest treatments. U-SF: secondary forests without Korean pine plantations; U: secondary forests adjacent to Korea pine plantations. Table S2. GLMMs exploring the effects of seed source limitation due to historical disturbance and human competing with pinecones, and season on Korean pine-granivores activities. Table S3 GLMMs exploring the effects of seed source limitation due to historical disturbance and human competing with pinecones, and season on Korean pine seed fates. Pre-DSP: Pre-dispersal seed predation, Post-DSP: Post-dispersal seed predation, SH-EP: Scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation. Table S4. GLMMs exploring the effects of thinning treatment and season on the main granivores occurrence. Table S5. GLMMs exploring the effects of thinning treatment and season on seed fates. Pre-DSP: Pre-dispersal seed predation, Post-DSP: Post-dispersal seed predation, SH-EP: Scatter-hoarding seed escaped predation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Geoff Wang, G., Li, R. et al. Cascading effect of source limitation on the granivore-mediated seed dispersal of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) in secondary forest ecosystems. Ecol Process 11, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00352-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00352-y

Keywords

  • Human disturbance
  • Thinning treatment
  • Synzoochorous interaction
  • Forest restoration